Any unresolved critical regressions?

Unfortunately I've found a few lately, though these are old 2.055 regressions.  The following are really irking me:

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6781 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6665

Also, this one rates pretty high in terms of severity IMHO and may be related to 6665.  I'm not sure if it's a regression but if not it's an absurdly annoying backend bug that should be fixed ASAP.

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6813


On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 5:34 PM, Walter Bright <walter at digitalmars.com>wrote:

> Any unresolved critical regressions?
> ______________________________**_________________
> dmd-beta mailing list
> dmd-beta at puremagic.com
> http://lists.puremagic.com/**mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta<http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/dmd-beta/attachments/20111017/9f5272d5/attachment.html>

On 10/17/2011 2:34 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
> Any unresolved critical regressions?

There's definitely a bunch (8) of regression reports filed since the last release.  I haven't tried to evaluate their criticality.

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/buglist.cgi?chfieldto=Now&query_format=advanced&chfield=[Bug%20creation]&chfieldfrom=2011-09-01&bug_severity=regression&bug_severity=blocker&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&component=coffimplib&component=DMD&component=druntime&component=dstress&component=htod&component=installer&component=make&component=Optlink&component=Phobos&component=websites&product=D

Hi,

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6502 really _needs_ to be fixed. Doing release builds is impossible in some projects because of it.

Regards,
Alex

On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 11:34 PM, Walter Bright <walter at digitalmars.com> wrote:
> Any unresolved critical regressions?
> _______________________________________________
> dmd-beta mailing list
> dmd-beta at puremagic.com
> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta
>

On 18 October 2011 05:39, Brad Roberts <braddr at puremagic.com> wrote:
> On 10/17/2011 2:34 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
>> Any unresolved critical regressions?
>
> There's definitely a bunch (8) of regression reports filed since the last release. ?I haven't tried to evaluate their criticality.
>
> http://d.puremagic.com/issues/buglist.cgi?chfieldto=Now&query_format=advanced&chfield=[Bug%20creation]&chfieldfrom=2011-09-01&bug_severity=regression&bug_severity=blocker&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&component=coffimplib&component=DMD&component=druntime&component=dstress&component=htod&component=installer&component=make&component=Optlink&component=Phobos&component=websites&product=D

I can't reproduce the two most serious-sounding ones (6665 and 6669). One of the others is trivial to fix:

bug 6781. Regression(2.055): Segfault with error in local alias template
expression.c(2500). IdentifierExp::semantic().

#if DMDV2
    if (hasThis(sc))
    {
        AggregateDeclaration *ad = sc->getStructClassScope();
-        if (ad->aliasthis)
+        if (ad && ad->aliasthis)
        {
Bug 6753 looks like the only other regression which is more recent
than 2.054. There's a few regressions from 2.053 though:
Bug 5364 "optimizer kills high dword of -1"  also looks very serious,
but I can't reproduce it either.

On 10/18/2011 2:44 AM, Don Clugston wrote:
> I can't reproduce the two most serious-sounding ones (6665 and 6669).

Reminder:  6665 occurs in 64-bit mode only.  I've only verified that it occurs on Linux.  It may or may not happen on FreeBSD-64.

On 18 October 2011 14:31, David Simcha <dsimcha at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 10/18/2011 2:44 AM, Don Clugston wrote:
>>
>> I can't reproduce the two most serious-sounding ones (6665 and 6669).
>
> Reminder: ?6665 occurs in 64-bit mode only. ?I've only verified that it occurs on Linux. ?It may or may not happen on FreeBSD-64.

I know that. I'm just saying that *I* can't help with them.

This one is preventing me from building anything (although it's technically not *caused* by dmd, it's caused by a change in the linker):

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6822

Any thoughts?

-Steve




>________________________________
>From: Walter Bright <walter at digitalmars.com>
>To: Discuss the dmd beta releases for D <dmd-beta at puremagic.com>
>Sent: Monday, October 17, 2011 5:34 PM
>Subject: [dmd-beta] Time for a new beta?
>
>Any unresolved critical regressions?
>_______________________________________________
>dmd-beta mailing list
>dmd-beta at puremagic.com
>http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/dmd-beta/attachments/20111019/fe2998f1/attachment.html>

Yes,

http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.d.general/66897

On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 7:00 AM, Steve Schveighoffer <schveiguy at yahoo.com> wrote:
> This one is preventing me from building anything (although it's technically
> not *caused* by dmd, it's caused by a change in the linker):
> http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6822
> Any thoughts?
> -Steve

sorry, meant to go to mailing list.



----- Forwarded Message -----
>From: Steve Schveighoffer <schveiguy at yahoo.com>
>To: Jesse Phillips <jesse.k.phillips at gmail.com>
>Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2011 11:10 AM
>Subject: Re: [dmd-beta] Time for a new beta?
>
>
>This is not a solution it is a band-aid.
>
>
>It's a familiar solution I've experienced in a past life, where company policy was to include *all* libraries twice on the link line in hopes the second time through would capture any stray unresolved symbols.? It doesn't always work.
>
>
>
>A solution would be to specify dependencies of phobos, probably through another variable in dmd.conf.
>
>
>
>>________________________________
>>From: Jesse Phillips <jesse.k.phillips at gmail.com>
>>To: Steve Schveighoffer <schveiguy at yahoo.com>; Discuss the dmd beta releases for D <dmd-beta at puremagic.com>
>>Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2011 10:38 AM
>>Subject: Re: [dmd-beta] Time for a new beta?
>>
>>Yes,
>>
>>http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.d.general/66897
>>
>>On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 7:00 AM, Steve Schveighoffer <schveiguy at yahoo.com> wrote:
>>> This one is preventing me from building anything (although it's technically
>>> not *caused* by dmd, it's caused by a change in the linker):
>>> http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6822
>>> Any thoughts?
>>> -Steve
>>
>>
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/dmd-beta/attachments/20111019/3f1da806/attachment.html>