At least I hope it's the last one! Only disastrous issues will be fixed now.

http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd1beta.zip http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd2beta.zip

crap, this breaks dcollections.? Not sure how this regression happened:

inout(int[]) foo(inout(int[]) x)
{
??? const y = x;
??? return x;
}


Error: cannot implicitly convert expression (x) of type inout(int[]) to const(int[])

inout should implicitly convert to const.? Kenji?

Sorry for the late entry...

-Steve


----- Original Message -----
> From: Walter Bright <walter at digitalmars.com>
> To: Discuss the dmd beta releases for D <dmd-beta at puremagic.com>
> Cc:
> Sent: Thursday, December 8, 2011 3:09 PM
> Subject: [dmd-beta] Last D beta 1.072 and 2.057
> 
> At least I hope it's the last one! Only disastrous issues will be fixed now.
> 
> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd1beta.zip
> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd2beta.zip
> _______________________________________________
> dmd-beta mailing list
> dmd-beta at puremagic.com
> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta
> 

Ouch! It is a regression caused by fix for issue 6912.
Now I'm testing a patch to fix it. Please wait a moment.

Kenji Hara

2011/12/9 Steve Schveighoffer <schveiguy at yahoo.com>:
> crap, this breaks dcollections.? Not sure how this regression happened:
>
> inout(int[]) foo(inout(int[]) x)
> {
> ??? const y = x;
> ??? return x;
> }
>
>
> Error: cannot implicitly convert expression (x) of type inout(int[]) to const(int[])
>
> inout should implicitly convert to const.? Kenji?
>
> Sorry for the late entry...
>
> -Steve

Posted. https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/550

Kenji Hara

2011/12/9 kenji hara <k.hara.pg at gmail.com>:
> Ouch! It is a regression caused by fix for issue 6912.
> Now I'm testing a patch to fix it. Please wait a moment.
>
> Kenji Hara
>
> 2011/12/9 Steve Schveighoffer <schveiguy at yahoo.com>:
>> crap, this breaks dcollections.? Not sure how this regression happened:
>>
>> inout(int[]) foo(inout(int[]) x)
>> {
>> ??? const y = x;
>> ??? return x;
>> }
>>
>>
>> Error: cannot implicitly convert expression (x) of type inout(int[]) to const(int[])
>>
>> inout should implicitly convert to const.? Kenji?
>>
>> Sorry for the late entry...
>>
>> -Steve

OK,

Gets past that part, but it still fails in a spot where I think it should pass.? example code:

inout(int[]) foo(inout(int)[] x)
{
??? return x;
}


Error: cannot implicitly convert expression (x) of type inout(int)[] to inout(int[])

Since I can convert immutable(int)[] to immutable(int[]), I should be able to do the same with inout.

-Steve



----- Original Message -----
> From: kenji hara <k.hara.pg at gmail.com>
> To: Steve Schveighoffer <schveiguy at yahoo.com>; Discuss the dmd beta releases for D <dmd-beta at puremagic.com>
> Cc:
> Sent: Thursday, December 8, 2011 5:35 PM
> Subject: Re: [dmd-beta] Last D beta 1.072 and 2.057
> 
> Posted. https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/550
> 
> Kenji Hara
> 
> 2011/12/9 kenji hara <k.hara.pg at gmail.com>:
>>  Ouch! It is a regression caused by fix for issue 6912.
>>  Now I'm testing a patch to fix it. Please wait a moment.
>> 
>>  Kenji Hara
>> 
>>  2011/12/9 Steve Schveighoffer <schveiguy at yahoo.com>:
>>>  crap, this breaks dcollections.? Not sure how this regression happened:
>>> 
>>>  inout(int[]) foo(inout(int[]) x)
>>>  {
>>>  ??? const y = x;
>>>  ??? return x;
>>>  }
>>> 
>>> 
>>>  Error: cannot implicitly convert expression (x) of type inout(int[]) to
> const(int[])
>>> 
>>>  inout should implicitly convert to const.? Kenji?
>>> 
>>>  Sorry for the late entry...
>>> 
>>>  -Steve
> 

2011/12/9 Walter Bright <walter at digitalmars.com>:
> At least I hope it's the last one! Only disastrous issues will be fixed now.
>
> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd1beta.zip
> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd2beta.zip
> _______________________________________________
> dmd-beta mailing list
> dmd-beta at puremagic.com
> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta

dmd1beta.zip has some differences from git repositories:
- src/dmd/argtypes.c and staticassert.c are newer than repo.
  Maybe you didn't push your local change up to github.com.
- ClassDeclaration::errorException is not defined in repo src.
  You didn't push your local change up to github.com.
  It is the issue that I've posted as dmd/pull/527.
- src/phobos/osx.mak. Maybe your local change is yet not pushed up to
github.com.
- src/phobos/std/stdint.d.
- Lack of src/phobos/std/c/osx/mach directory. I'm not sure which is
correct, zip or repo.

Kenji Hara

Done.

On 12/9/2011 6:59 PM, kenji hara wrote:
> 2011/12/9 Walter Bright<walter at digitalmars.com>:
>> At least I hope it's the last one! Only disastrous issues will be fixed now.
>>
>> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd1beta.zip
>> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd2beta.zip
>> _______________________________________________
>> dmd-beta mailing list
>> dmd-beta at puremagic.com
>> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta
> dmd1beta.zip has some differences from git repositories:
> - src/dmd/argtypes.c and staticassert.c are newer than repo.
>    Maybe you didn't push your local change up to github.com.
> - ClassDeclaration::errorException is not defined in repo src.
>    You didn't push your local change up to github.com.
>    It is the issue that I've posted as dmd/pull/527.
> - src/phobos/osx.mak. Maybe your local change is yet not pushed up to
> github.com.
> - src/phobos/std/stdint.d.
> - Lack of src/phobos/std/c/osx/mach directory. I'm not sure which is
> correct, zip or repo.
>
> Kenji Hara
>

2011/12/10 Walter Bright <walter at digitalmars.com>:
> Done.
>
>
> On 12/9/2011 6:59 PM, kenji hara wrote:
>>
>> 2011/12/9 Walter Bright<walter at digitalmars.com>:
>>>
>>> At least I hope it's the last one! Only disastrous issues will be fixed now.
>>>
>>> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd1beta.zip
>>> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd2beta.zip
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> dmd-beta mailing list
>>> dmd-beta at puremagic.com
>>> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta
>>
>> dmd1beta.zip has some differences from git repositories:
>> - src/dmd/argtypes.c and staticassert.c are newer than repo.
>> ? Maybe you didn't push your local change up to github.com.
>> - ClassDeclaration::errorException is not defined in repo src.
>> ? You didn't push your local change up to github.com.
>> ? It is the issue that I've posted as dmd/pull/527.
>> - src/phobos/osx.mak. Maybe your local change is yet not pushed up to
>> github.com.
>> - src/phobos/std/stdint.d.
>> - Lack of src/phobos/std/c/osx/mach directory. I'm not sure which is
>> correct, zip or repo.
>>
>> Kenji Hara
>>
> _______________________________________________
> dmd-beta mailing list
> dmd-beta at puremagic.com
> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta

Still not done.
src/aggregate.h and src/idgen.c in repo have some missing declarations.
Please check.

Kenji Hara

On 12/9/2011 10:48 PM, kenji hara wrote:
>
> Still not done.
> src/aggregate.h and src/idgen.c in repo have some missing declarations.
> Please check.
>

I haven't uploaded the new beta yet. Will shortly.

On Saturday, December 10, 2011 11:59:10 kenji hara wrote:
> 2011/12/9 Walter Bright <walter at digitalmars.com>:
> > At least I hope it's the last one! Only disastrous issues will be fixed now.
> > 
> > http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd1beta.zip
> > http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd2beta.zip
> > _______________________________________________
> > dmd-beta mailing list
> > dmd-beta at puremagic.com
> > http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta
> 
> dmd1beta.zip has some differences from git repositories:
> - src/dmd/argtypes.c and staticassert.c are newer than repo.
>   Maybe you didn't push your local change up to github.com.
> - ClassDeclaration::errorException is not defined in repo src.
>   You didn't push your local change up to github.com.
>   It is the issue that I've posted as dmd/pull/527.
> - src/phobos/osx.mak. Maybe your local change is yet not pushed up to
> github.com.
> - src/phobos/std/stdint.d.
> - Lack of src/phobos/std/c/osx/mach directory. I'm not sure which is
> correct, zip or repo.

It's been argued before that Walter should generate the zip file from scratch every time from the git repository, but for whatever reason, I guess that he doesn't like that idea (or just doesn't want to take the time to change his process), since he's never done it.

- Jonathan M Davis