April 07, 2012 [dmd-beta] D 2.059 beta 3 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd2beta.zip The only thing is 7815 is addressed again. _______________________________________________ dmd-beta mailing list dmd-beta@puremagic.com http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta |
April 08, 2012 Re: [dmd-beta] D 2.059 beta 3 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Walter Bright Attachments:
| It looks like this fix fixes the test case, but the codebase I reduced the test case from still fails. I've reopened the bug and I'm going to try to create a new test case that still fails.
On Sun, Apr 8, 2012 at 1:15 AM, Walter Bright <walter@digitalmars.com>wrote:
>
> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/**dmd2beta.zip<http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd2beta.zip>
>
> The only thing is 7815 is addressed again.
> ______________________________**_________________
> dmd-beta mailing list
> dmd-beta@puremagic.com
> http://lists.puremagic.com/**mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta<http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta>
>
|
April 08, 2012 Re: [dmd-beta] D 2.059 beta 3 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Walter Bright Attachments:
| I noticed that write families have a regression. http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7857 I did 'git blame' and kenji introduced those templates. Kenji, can you fix this bug ASAP? Masahiro On Sun, Apr 8, 2012 at 2:15 PM, Walter Bright <walter@digitalmars.com>wrote: > > http://ftp.digitalmars.com/**dmd2beta.zip<http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd2beta.zip> > > The only thing is 7815 is addressed again. > ______________________________**_________________ > dmd-beta mailing list > dmd-beta@puremagic.com > http://lists.puremagic.com/**mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta<http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta> > |
April 08, 2012 Re: [dmd-beta] D 2.059 beta 3 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to David Simcha | On 4/8/2012 6:51 AM, David Simcha wrote: > It looks like this fix fixes the test case, but the codebase I reduced the test case from still fails. I've reopened the bug and I'm going to try to create a new test case that still fails. > Not to put any pressure on :-) but this is the only thing holding up the release. _______________________________________________ dmd-beta mailing list dmd-beta@puremagic.com http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta |
April 08, 2012 Re: [dmd-beta] D 2.059 beta 3 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Walter Bright Attachments:
| I've got dustmite running right now but this is a nightmarish bug that
involves a zillion layers of template instantiation in SciD.
On Apr 8, 2012 1:57 PM, "Walter Bright" <walter@digitalmars.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 4/8/2012 6:51 AM, David Simcha wrote:
>
>> It looks like this fix fixes the test case, but the codebase I reduced
>> the test case from still fails. I've reopened the bug and I'm going to try
>> to create a new test case that still fails.
>>
>>
> Not to put any pressure on :-) but this is the only thing holding up the
> release.
> ______________________________**_________________
> dmd-beta mailing list
> dmd-beta@puremagic.com
> http://lists.puremagic.com/**mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta<http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta>
>
|
April 08, 2012 Re: [dmd-beta] D 2.059 beta 3 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Walter Bright | On 8 Apr 2012, at 19:55, Walter Bright wrote: > On 4/8/2012 6:51 AM, David Simcha wrote: >> It looks like this fix fixes the test case, but the codebase I reduced the test case from still fails. I've reopened the bug and I'm going to try to create a new test case that still fails. >> > > Not to put any pressure on :-) but this is the only thing holding up the release. In case you are looking for regressions, feel free to grab Thrift (e.g. from https://github.com/klickverbot/thrift) and run the test suite (./configure, then »make check« in lib/d/). Still working on tracking down the mixin forward ref related regression, and stumbled upon another segfault-on-invalid bug. I start to wonder whether shipping with the »soldier on« change is really a good idea… David _______________________________________________ dmd-beta mailing list dmd-beta@puremagic.com http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta |
April 08, 2012 Re: [dmd-beta] D 2.059 beta 3 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to David Simcha Attachments:
| I've submitted a not-very-reduced test case to Bugzilla. It's several thousand lines but at least it reproduces the bug. I'm currently visiting my family for a long weekend and have limited time to work on this, and this appears to be the Bug From Hell. If anyone else wants to try their hand at creating a test case, see http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7815 . On Sun, Apr 8, 2012 at 9:51 AM, David Simcha <dsimcha@gmail.com> wrote: > It looks like this fix fixes the test case, but the codebase I reduced the test case from still fails. I've reopened the bug and I'm going to try to create a new test case that still fails. > > > On Sun, Apr 8, 2012 at 1:15 AM, Walter Bright <walter@digitalmars.com>wrote: > >> >> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/**dmd2beta.zip<http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd2beta.zip> >> >> The only thing is 7815 is addressed again. >> ______________________________**_________________ >> dmd-beta mailing list >> dmd-beta@puremagic.com >> http://lists.puremagic.com/**mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta<http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta> >> > > |
April 08, 2012 Re: [dmd-beta] D 2.059 beta 3 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to David Nadlinger | On 8 Apr 2012, at 20:44, David Nadlinger wrote: > Still working on tracking down the mixin forward ref related regression, and stumbled upon another segfault-on-invalid bug. http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7859 David _______________________________________________ dmd-beta mailing list dmd-beta@puremagic.com http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta |
April 08, 2012 Re: [dmd-beta] D 2.059 beta 3 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Walter Bright | On 8 Apr 2012, at 19:55, Walter Bright wrote: > Not to put any pressure on :-) but this is the only thing holding up the release. Another segfault-on-invalid bug: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7861 To be fair, DMD 2.058 crashed in a different location as well for this one, but again, it seems to be related to the template instantiation error changes from issue 7481 – are we really comfortable with shipping it in 2.059? David _______________________________________________ dmd-beta mailing list dmd-beta@puremagic.com http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta |
April 09, 2012 Re: [dmd-beta] D 2.059 beta 3 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to David Nadlinger | On 8 Apr 2012, at 20:44, David Nadlinger wrote: > Still working on tracking down the mixin forward ref related regression, […] Another bug probably somehow related to the Thrift test suite breakage; at least, I am having a hard time figuring out what is really going on with the confusion it causes: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7862 I don't want to spoil the excitement, but DMD has not caused me as much trouble for quite some time - I think we should take extra care to ensure that this release is solid. David _______________________________________________ dmd-beta mailing list dmd-beta@puremagic.com http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta |
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation