February 24, 2014
On Monday, 24 February 2014 at 11:21:32 UTC, Kapps wrote:
> On Monday, 24 February 2014 at 11:04:14 UTC, Szymon Gatner wrote:
>> So 2.065 is not the one that will make class methods final by default?
>
> Correct. The pull for it is https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/2895

Clear, thanks. 2.066 then I suppose?
February 24, 2014
On Monday, 24 February 2014 at 11:21:32 UTC, Kapps wrote:
> On Monday, 24 February 2014 at 11:04:14 UTC, Szymon Gatner wrote:
>> So 2.065 is not the one that will make class methods final by default?
>
> Correct. The pull for it is https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/2895

Not really. This pull introduce the virtual keyword. The next step will afaik force you to write on every method if it is virtual or final. The step afterwards will probably introduce final by default.
February 24, 2014
On Monday, 24 February 2014 at 11:45:20 UTC, Namespace wrote:
> On Monday, 24 February 2014 at 11:21:32 UTC, Kapps wrote:
>> On Monday, 24 February 2014 at 11:04:14 UTC, Szymon Gatner wrote:
>>> So 2.065 is not the one that will make class methods final by default?
>>
>> Correct. The pull for it is https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/2895
>
> Not really. This pull introduce the virtual keyword. The next step will afaik force you to write on every method if it is virtual or final. The step afterwards will probably introduce final by default.

Yes yes, I understand :)
February 24, 2014
On Monday, 24 February 2014 at 11:44:30 UTC, Szymon Gatner wrote:
> On Monday, 24 February 2014 at 11:21:32 UTC, Kapps wrote:
>> On Monday, 24 February 2014 at 11:04:14 UTC, Szymon Gatner wrote:
>>> So 2.065 is not the one that will make class methods final by default?
>>
>> Correct. The pull for it is https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/2895
>
> Clear, thanks. 2.066 then I suppose?

Let us hope so!
February 24, 2014
On Monday, 24 February 2014 at 11:45:20 UTC, Namespace wrote:

> Not really. This pull introduce the virtual keyword. The next step will afaik force you to write on every method if it is virtual or final. The step afterwards will probably introduce final by default.

Wait, does this mean we finally came to some kind of agreement on the whole debate? I was sure that any kind of change of current behaviour was being vetoed
February 24, 2014
On Monday, 24 February 2014 at 08:45:31 UTC, Andrew Edwards wrote:
> Windows:
> 	http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd-2.065.0.exe
> 	http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.2.065.0.windows.zip

The .zip file for Windows isn't listed on the download page.
http://dlang.org/download.html
February 24, 2014
On Monday, 24 February 2014 at 08:45:31 UTC, Andrew Edwards wrote:
> The final release of DMD 2.065 is now available.
Cool.

I found two bugs in the comments to library changes point 2.
The 2nd comment says "all values are not true" but what the check does is "not all values are true".
Same for the 4th comment: "all values do not convert to true" should be "not all values convert to true".
February 24, 2014
Arch packages have just been updated.
February 24, 2014
Awesome!
First thing I noticed though, the Windows installer seemed to forget where
my existing D installation is, and tried to install it somewhere else.
I thought this got fixed months ago? Regression in the installer?


On 24 February 2014 18:45, Andrew Edwards <ridimz@yahoo.com> wrote:

> The final release of DMD 2.065 is now available. [1] contains complete descriptions of all changes, enhancements and fixes for this release.
>
> Available binaries can be accessed at [2]. Since the website will lag slightly behind, links are provided below for convenience.
>
> All Systems:
>         http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.2.065.0.zip
>
> FreeBSD:
>         http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.2.065.0.freebsd-64.zip
>         http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.2.065.0.freebsd-32.zip
>
> Linux:
>         http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd_2.065.0-0_i386.deb
>         http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd_2.065.0-0_amd64.deb
>         http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd-2.065.0-0.fedora.i386.rpm
>         http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd-2.065.0-0.fedora.x86_64.rpm
>         http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd-2.065.0-0.openSUSE.i386.rpm
>         http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd-2.065.0-0.openSUSE.x86_64.rpm
>         http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.2.065.0.linux.zip
>
> MAC OS X:
>         http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.2.065.0.dmg
>         http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.2.065.0.osx.zip
>
> Windows:
>         http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd-2.065.0.exe
>         http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.2.065.0.windows.zip
>
> [1] http://dlang.org/chagelog.html
> [2] http://dlang.org/download.html
>
> Regards,
> Andrew
> --
> --------------------
> http://www.akeron.co
> auto getAddress() {
>     string location = "@", period = ".";
>     return ("info" ~ location ~ "afidem" ~ period ~ "org");
> }
>


February 24, 2014
On Monday, 24 February 2014 at 17:42:07 UTC, Manu wrote:
> Awesome!
> First thing I noticed though, the Windows installer seemed to forget where
> my existing D installation is, and tried to install it somewhere else.
> I thought this got fixed months ago? Regression in the installer?
>

Nope, not a regression. That never got implemented.
1 2 3 4 5 6