Thread overview
DMD-0.121 regressions
Apr 18, 2005
Thomas Kuehne
Apr 18, 2005
Derek Parnell
Apr 21, 2005
Robert M. Münch
Apr 19, 2005
Stewart Gordon
Apr 19, 2005
Thomas Kuehne
April 18, 2005
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

XFAIL -> ERROR http://dstress.kuehne.cn/nocompile/class_07.d

PASS -> ERROR
http://dstress.kuehne.cn/run/typeid_13.d

Open issues:
http://dstress.kuehne.cn/www/dstress.html

Complete results: (~1.4 MB)
http://dstress.kuehne.cn/www/results.html

Thomas


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iD8DBQFCY1WE3w+/yD4P9tIRAoR3AKCRa6nIwgSORweCx0iHOuHEzYW9nACgrz8m
Ql3EwR1UVEN4fcwhw676aAg=
=oW1W
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
April 18, 2005
On Mon, 18 Apr 2005 08:36:53 +0200, Thomas Kuehne wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> XFAIL -> ERROR http://dstress.kuehne.cn/nocompile/class_07.d
> 
> PASS -> ERROR
> http://dstress.kuehne.cn/run/typeid_13.d
> 
> Open issues:
> http://dstress.kuehne.cn/www/dstress.html
> 
> Complete results: (~1.4 MB)
> http://dstress.kuehne.cn/www/results.html
> 
> Thomas
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> 
> iD8DBQFCY1WE3w+/yD4P9tIRAoR3AKCRa6nIwgSORweCx0iHOuHEzYW9nACgrz8m
> Ql3EwR1UVEN4fcwhw676aAg=
> =oW1W
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

I've update the graphs at

  http://www.users.bigpond.com/ddparnell/dstress_results.html

The salient points are :

** 89.7% pass rate (from 84.0%)

** Good to Bad ratio is now 8.74 (from 5.24). That is, for each failure
there are 8.74 successes.

** We had 76 more expected passes.
** We had 21 more expected failures.

** We had 7 fewer unexpected passes.
** We had 74 fewer unexpected failures.
** We had 16 fewer compiler crashes.

-- 
Derek
Melbourne, Australia
18/04/2005 5:05:18 PM
April 19, 2005
Thomas Kuehne wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> XFAIL -> ERROR
> http://dstress.kuehne.cn/nocompile/class_07.d
> 
> PASS -> ERROR
> http://dstress.kuehne.cn/run/typeid_13.d
> 
> Open issues:
> http://dstress.kuehne.cn/www/dstress.html
> 
> Complete results: (~1.4 MB)
> http://dstress.kuehne.cn/www/results.html
> 
> Thomas

Success rate up from 84.0% to 89.7% (we're nearly at the 90% mark, but will we be for long?)
Stability rate up from 98.5% to 99.5% (crossed the 99% mark, that must be a milestone!)

http://smjg.port5.com/pr/d/dstress.xls

BTW I noticed these:

1. Are you sure abstract_08 should error at line 20?  It's either this or line 15.  The spec doesn't clarify if abstract with a body should be allowed, or what it should mean if it is.

2. You've used the name destructor_04 twice, one in run and one in norun.

Stewart.

-- 
My e-mail is valid but not my primary mailbox.  Please keep replies on the 'group where everyone may benefit.
April 19, 2005
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Stewart Gordon schrieb am Tue, 19 Apr 2005 12:06:23 +0100:
> BTW I noticed these:
>
> 1. Are you sure abstract_08 should error at line 20?  It's either this or line 15.  The spec doesn't clarify if abstract with a body should be allowed, or what it should mean if it is.

Split into abstract_08 and 13.

> 2. You've used the name destructor_04 twice, one in run and one in norun.

Thanks, fixed

Thomas


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iD8DBQFCZO493w+/yD4P9tIRAkuRAJ0UgBCm7akpVCTTZsCFu+yTnOzyrwCgkIjb
Y6JUHvpRFT3Odgv1jfQOZ2E=
=raW9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
April 21, 2005
On Mon, 18 Apr 2005 09:20:46 +0200, Derek Parnell <derek@psych.ward> wrote:

> The salient points are :
>
> ** 89.7% pass rate (from 84.0%)
>
> ** Good to Bad ratio is now 8.74 (from 5.24). That is, for each failure there are 8.74 successes.
>
> ** We had 76 more expected passes.
> ** We had 21 more expected failures.
>
> ** We had 7 fewer unexpected passes.
> ** We had 74 fewer unexpected failures.
> ** We had 16 fewer compiler crashes.

Thanks for this management summary, that's the info I like :-))

-- 
Robert M. Münch
Management & IT Freelancer
http://www.robertmuench.de