Why at compilation of the following code:(sc test.cpp -mx -c -cpp)

void
kpdodebug(unsigned const char *, unsigned const char *, unsigned const char
*);

class efdat
    {
    private:
        char         *dat;
    public:
        int          rezbl;
        efdat()
            {
            kpdodebug(__FILE__, __FUNC__, __TIMESTAMP__);
            };
    };

The mistake is given out:
test.cpp(13) : Error: expression expected
--- errorlevel 1

A little testing shows that __FUNC__ is not defined for DMC. What is your
reasoning for assuming so? (Does it work for any other compiler?)
-Rajiv Bhagwat

ZaitcevE.V. <Genior@km.ru> wrote in message news:9tibih$1as3$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> Why at compilation of the following code:(sc test.cpp -mx -c -cpp)
>
> void
> kpdodebug(unsigned const char *, unsigned const char *, unsigned const
char
> *);
>
> class efdat
>     {
>     private:
>         char         *dat;
>     public:
>         int          rezbl;
>         efdat()
>             {
>             kpdodebug(__FILE__, __FUNC__, __TIMESTAMP__);
>             };
>     };
>
> The mistake is given out:
> test.cpp(13) : Error: expression expected
> --- errorlevel 1
>
>
>
>
>

__FUNCTION__ is the one he's likely looking for.

    www.digitalmars.com/ctg/predefined.html



"Rajiv Bhagwat" <dataflow@vsnl.com> wrote in message news:9tid72$1d54$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> A little testing shows that __FUNC__ is not defined for DMC. What is your
> reasoning for assuming so? (Does it work for any other compiler?)
> -Rajiv Bhagwat
>
> ZaitcevE.V. <Genior@km.ru> wrote in message news:9tibih$1as3$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> > Why at compilation of the following code:(sc test.cpp -mx -c -cpp)
> >
> > void
> > kpdodebug(unsigned const char *, unsigned const char *, unsigned const
> char
> > *);
> >
> > class efdat
> >     {
> >     private:
> >         char         *dat;
> >     public:
> >         int          rezbl;
> >         efdat()
> >             {
> >             kpdodebug(__FILE__, __FUNC__, __TIMESTAMP__);
> >             };
> >     };
> >
> > The mistake is given out:
> > test.cpp(13) : Error: expression expected
> > --- errorlevel 1
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>

Ignore that last post of mine (!). __FUNC__ is defined and should work.


#include <stdio.h>

void main()
{
    printf("__FUNC__ = '%s'\n", __FUNC__);
}

prints:

__FUNC__ = 'main'

"Walter" <walter@digitalmars.com> wrote in message news:9tjfh0$2nmf$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> __FUNCTION__ is the one he's likely looking for.
>
>     www.digitalmars.com/ctg/predefined.html
>
>
>
> "Rajiv Bhagwat" <dataflow@vsnl.com> wrote in message news:9tid72$1d54$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> > A little testing shows that __FUNC__ is not defined for DMC. What is
your
> > reasoning for assuming so? (Does it work for any other compiler?)
> > -Rajiv Bhagwat
> >
> > ZaitcevE.V. <Genior@km.ru> wrote in message news:9tibih$1as3$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> > > Why at compilation of the following code:(sc test.cpp -mx -c -cpp)
> > >
> > > void
> > > kpdodebug(unsigned const char *, unsigned const char *, unsigned const
> > char
> > > *);
> > >
> > > class efdat
> > >     {
> > >     private:
> > >         char         *dat;
> > >     public:
> > >         int          rezbl;
> > >         efdat()
> > >             {
> > >             kpdodebug(__FILE__, __FUNC__, __TIMESTAMP__);
> > >             };
> > >     };
> > >
> > > The mistake is given out:
> > > test.cpp(13) : Error: expression expected
> > > --- errorlevel 1
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>

"ZaitcevE.V." wrote:

> Why at compilation of the following code:(sc test.cpp -mx -c -cpp)
>
> void
> kpdodebug(unsigned const char *, unsigned const char *, unsigned const char
> *);
>
> class efdat
>     {
>     private:
>         char         *dat;
>     public:
>         int          rezbl;
>         efdat()
>             {
>             kpdodebug(__FILE__, __FUNC__, __TIMESTAMP__);
>             };

I thing the ';' here is not supposed to be there isn't it???

>
>     };
>
> The mistake is given out:
> test.cpp(13) : Error: expression expected
> --- errorlevel 1

As far as I know __FUNC__ works just fine...

Jan

Walter wrote:

> Ignore that last post of mine (!). __FUNC__ is defined and should work.

You should be able to just 'cancel' them...

Jan

Jan Knepper <jan@smartsoft.cc> ïèøåò â ñîîáùåíèè:3BFD4AE5.22BBAC5E@smartsoft.cc...
> "ZaitcevE.V." wrote:
>
> > Why at compilation of the following code:(sc test.cpp -mx -c -cpp)
> >
> > void
> > kpdodebug(unsigned const char *, unsigned const char *, unsigned const
char
> > *);
> >
> > class efdat
> >     {
> >     private:
> >         char         *dat;
> >     public:
> >         int          rezbl;
> >         efdat()
> >             {
> >             kpdodebug(__FILE__, __FUNC__, __TIMESTAMP__);
> >             };
>
> I thing the ';' here is not supposed to be there isn't it???
>
> As far as I know __FUNC__ works just fine...
>
> Jan
>
>
>

Jan it is a typing error in the message. The mistake arises at use in the designer of a class. Can check up.

mr.Wolter,
These macroconst I always use for debugging and all was good.
The mistake has arisen at use them in the designer of a class (it(he) enough
large).
I use the compiler: Digital Mars Compiler Version 8.0B7n


Walter <walter@digitalmars.com> ÐÉÛÅÔ × ÓÏÏÂÝÅÎÉÉ:9tji0g$2qs5$2@digitaldaemon.com...
> Ignore that last post of mine (!). __FUNC__ is defined and should work.
>
>
> #include <stdio.h>
>
> void main()
> {
>     printf("__FUNC__ = '%s'\n", __FUNC__);
> }
>
> prints:
>
> __FUNC__ = 'main'
>
> "Walter" <walter@digitalmars.com> wrote in message news:9tjfh0$2nmf$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> > __FUNCTION__ is the one he's likely looking for.
> >
> >     www.digitalmars.com/ctg/predefined.html
> >
> >
> >