Jump to page: 1 2
Thread overview
FG with DOSX
Jan 04, 2002
Rajiv Bhagwat
Jan 04, 2002
Roland
Jan 09, 2002
Rajiv Bhagwat
Jan 09, 2002
Jan Knepper
Jan 10, 2002
Walter
Jan 10, 2002
Roland
Jan 10, 2002
Rajiv Bhagwat
Jan 10, 2002
Roland
Jan 10, 2002
Jan Knepper
Jan 11, 2002
Rajiv Bhagwat
Jan 11, 2002
Rajiv Bhagwat
January 04, 2002
I wanted to upgrade some of the older 16 bit apps to 32 bit using -mx mode. I have fg.h and fgp.lib required for this. I got a few linker errors. After going through the readme, they have asked to download fg_dosx.zip from their BBS. (All this is dated 1994, so no BBS would exist today.)

Does anyone have this file, required to use FlashTeks Flash Graphics in dosx mode?



January 04, 2002
Rajiv Bhagwat a écrit :

> I wanted to upgrade some of the older 16 bit apps to 32 bit using -mx mode. I have fg.h and fgp.lib required for this. I got a few linker errors. After going through the readme, they have asked to download fg_dosx.zip from their BBS. (All this is dated 1994, so no BBS would exist today.)
>
> Does anyone have this file, required to use FlashTeks Flash Graphics in dosx mode?

There was already a discussion about FlashTek in c++.dos directory, subject:
FlashGraphics.
There seems to be a problem.
I don't know if it is solved.

good luck

Roland


January 09, 2002
Sorry Roland, even after setting Synchronization setting to 'All Messages' I am getting only 3 messages in c++.dos.

If you have the previous message, kindly give me the short summary. (And any
conclusions!) Thanks.
- Rajiv

"Roland" <rv@ronetech.com> wrote in message news:3C3576DA.53AFB81B@ronetech.com...
> Rajiv Bhagwat a écrit :
>
> > I wanted to upgrade some of the older 16 bit apps to 32 bit using -mx
mode.
> > I have fg.h and fgp.lib required for this. I got a few linker errors.
After
> > going through the readme, they have asked to download fg_dosx.zip from
their
> > BBS. (All this is dated 1994, so no BBS would exist today.)
> >
> > Does anyone have this file, required to use FlashTeks Flash Graphics in
dosx
> > mode?
>
> There was already a discussion about FlashTek in c++.dos directory,
subject:
> FlashGraphics.
> There seems to be a problem.
> I don't know if it is solved.
>
> good luck
>
> Roland
>
>


January 09, 2002
Weird!
I am sure you're not the only one using MSO...
Jan



Rajiv Bhagwat wrote:

> Sorry Roland, even after setting Synchronization setting to 'All Messages' I am getting only 3 messages in c++.dos.
>
> If you have the previous message, kindly give me the short summary. (And any
> conclusions!) Thanks.
> - Rajiv
>
> "Roland" <rv@ronetech.com> wrote in message news:3C3576DA.53AFB81B@ronetech.com...
> > Rajiv Bhagwat a écrit :
> >
> > > I wanted to upgrade some of the older 16 bit apps to 32 bit using -mx
> mode.
> > > I have fg.h and fgp.lib required for this. I got a few linker errors.
> After
> > > going through the readme, they have asked to download fg_dosx.zip from
> their
> > > BBS. (All this is dated 1994, so no BBS would exist today.)
> > >
> > > Does anyone have this file, required to use FlashTeks Flash Graphics in
> dosx
> > > mode?
> >
> > There was already a discussion about FlashTek in c++.dos directory,
> subject:
> > FlashGraphics.
> > There seems to be a problem.
> > I don't know if it is solved.
> >
> > good luck
> >
> > Roland
> >
> >

January 10, 2002
I'm having the same wierd problems.

"Jan Knepper" <jan@smartsoft.cc> wrote in message news:3C3C6EC4.C578B3F2@smartsoft.cc...
> Weird!
> I am sure you're not the only one using MSO...
> Jan
>
>
>
> Rajiv Bhagwat wrote:
>
> > Sorry Roland, even after setting Synchronization setting to 'All
Messages' I
> > am getting only 3 messages in c++.dos.
> >
> > If you have the previous message, kindly give me the short summary. (And
any
> > conclusions!) Thanks.
> > - Rajiv
> >
> > "Roland" <rv@ronetech.com> wrote in message news:3C3576DA.53AFB81B@ronetech.com...
> > > Rajiv Bhagwat a écrit :
> > >
> > > > I wanted to upgrade some of the older 16 bit apps to 32 bit
using -mx
> > mode.
> > > > I have fg.h and fgp.lib required for this. I got a few linker
errors.
> > After
> > > > going through the readme, they have asked to download fg_dosx.zip
from
> > their
> > > > BBS. (All this is dated 1994, so no BBS would exist today.)
> > > >
> > > > Does anyone have this file, required to use FlashTeks Flash Graphics
in
> > dosx
> > > > mode?
> > >
> > > There was already a discussion about FlashTek in c++.dos directory,
> > subject:
> > > FlashGraphics.
> > > There seems to be a problem.
> > > I don't know if it is solved.
> > >
> > > good luck
> > >
> > > Roland
> > >
> > >
>


January 10, 2002
Rajiv Bhagwat a écrit :

> Sorry Roland, even after setting Synchronization setting to 'All Messages' I am getting only 3 messages in c++.dos.
>
> If you have the previous message, kindly give me the short summary. (And any
> conclusions!) Thanks.
> - Rajiv
>
> "Roland" <rv@ronetech.com> wrote in message news:3C3576DA.53AFB81B@ronetech.com...
> > Rajiv Bhagwat a écrit :
> >
> > > I wanted to upgrade some of the older 16 bit apps to 32 bit using -mx
> mode.
> > > I have fg.h and fgp.lib required for this. I got a few linker errors.
> After
> > > going through the readme, they have asked to download fg_dosx.zip from
> their
> > > BBS. (All this is dated 1994, so no BBS would exist today.)
> > >
> > > Does anyone have this file, required to use FlashTeks Flash Graphics in
> dosx
> > > mode?
> >
> > There was already a discussion about FlashTek in c++.dos directory,
> subject:
> > FlashGraphics.
> > There seems to be a problem.
> > I don't know if it is solved.
> >
> > good luck
> >
> > Roland
> >
> >

I don't understand the problem.
Do you want i send all the messages in c++.dos concerning FG ?

Roland


January 10, 2002
My simple question is : does anyone have 'fg_dosx.zip' ?

As the file was freely available for download from the maker's BBS, I assume I am not breaking any laws by asking it.

If there were any methods discussed (in the newsgroup) so that the I can use FGP.LIB without this file for -mx compiles, that would be helpful. Otherwise, I assume that the file would still be required for linking the missing symbols.

- Rajiv


"Roland" <rv@ronetech.com> wrote in message news:3C3D54D1.83955689@ronetech.com...
>
> Rajiv Bhagwat a écrit :
>
> > Sorry Roland, even after setting Synchronization setting to 'All
Messages' I
> > am getting only 3 messages in c++.dos.
> >
> > If you have the previous message, kindly give me the short summary. (And
any
> > conclusions!) Thanks.
> > - Rajiv
> >
> > "Roland" <rv@ronetech.com> wrote in message news:3C3576DA.53AFB81B@ronetech.com...
> > > Rajiv Bhagwat a écrit :
> > >
> > > > I wanted to upgrade some of the older 16 bit apps to 32 bit
using -mx
> > mode.
> > > > I have fg.h and fgp.lib required for this. I got a few linker
errors.
> > After
> > > > going through the readme, they have asked to download fg_dosx.zip
from
> > their
> > > > BBS. (All this is dated 1994, so no BBS would exist today.)
> > > >
> > > > Does anyone have this file, required to use FlashTeks Flash Graphics
in
> > dosx
> > > > mode?
> > >
> > > There was already a discussion about FlashTek in c++.dos directory,
> > subject:
> > > FlashGraphics.
> > > There seems to be a problem.
> > > I don't know if it is solved.
> > >
> > > good luck
> > >
> > > Roland
> > >
> > >
>
> I don't understand the problem.
> Do you want i send all the messages in c++.dos concerning FG ?
>
> Roland
>
>


January 10, 2002
Rajiv Bhagwat a écrit :

> My simple question is : does anyone have 'fg_dosx.zip' ?

not me.

> As the file was freely available for download from the maker's BBS, I assume I am not breaking any laws by asking it.
>
> If there were any methods discussed (in the newsgroup) so that the I can use FGP.LIB without this file for -mx compiles, that would be helpful. Otherwise, I assume that the file would still be required for linking the missing symbols.
>
> - Rajiv

may be (i hope) you can ask

Werner Hürttlen <w.huerttlen@fz-juelich.de>

Roland


January 10, 2002
Somebody gave me the originals of the FG disks a long time ago...
I've got an FGDISK1.zip and FGDISK2.zip.
I think this stuff is originally copyrighted by one of the Huffman brothers...
I think it was Joe Huffman, Doug Huffman, http://www.dosextender.com/ , did the
DOSX stuff.



Roland wrote:

> Rajiv Bhagwat a écrit :
>
> > My simple question is : does anyone have 'fg_dosx.zip' ?
>
> not me.
>
> > As the file was freely available for download from the maker's BBS, I assume I am not breaking any laws by asking it.
> >
> > If there were any methods discussed (in the newsgroup) so that the I can use FGP.LIB without this file for -mx compiles, that would be helpful. Otherwise, I assume that the file would still be required for linking the missing symbols.
> >
> > - Rajiv
>
> may be (i hope) you can ask
>
> Werner Hürttlen <w.huerttlen@fz-juelich.de>
>
> Roland

January 11, 2002
Thanks, Roland and Jan. I will proceed from the references. - Rajiv


"Jan Knepper" <jan@smartsoft.cc> wrote in message news:3C3DDF72.5BF9D6C@smartsoft.cc...
> Somebody gave me the originals of the FG disks a long time ago...
> I've got an FGDISK1.zip and FGDISK2.zip.
> I think this stuff is originally copyrighted by one of the Huffman
brothers...
> I think it was Joe Huffman, Doug Huffman, http://www.dosextender.com/ ,
did the
> DOSX stuff.
>
>
>
> Roland wrote:
>
> > Rajiv Bhagwat a écrit :
> >
> > > My simple question is : does anyone have 'fg_dosx.zip' ?
> >
> > not me.
> >
> > > As the file was freely available for download from the maker's BBS, I
assume
> > > I am not breaking any laws by asking it.
> > >
> > > If there were any methods discussed (in the newsgroup) so that the I
can use
> > > FGP.LIB without this file for -mx compiles, that would be helpful. Otherwise, I assume that the file would still be required for linking
the
> > > missing symbols.
> > >
> > > - Rajiv
> >
> > may be (i hope) you can ask
> >
> > Werner Hürttlen <w.huerttlen@fz-juelich.de>
> >
> > Roland
>
« First   ‹ Prev
1 2