Thread overview
January 06
I've always enjoyed reading end-of-the year stats at other blogs. I thought it would be fun to do the same for the D Blog. If you've been curious about which posts visitors are viewing, or which links they're clicking, this post is for you.

https://dlang.org/blog/2016/06/03/recent-d-foundation-activities/


January 06
On Friday, 6 January 2017 at 14:54:45 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
> I've always enjoyed reading end-of-the year stats at other blogs. I thought it would be fun to do the same for the D Blog. If you've been curious about which posts visitors are viewing, or which links they're clicking, this post is for you.
>
> https://dlang.org/blog/2016/06/03/recent-d-foundation-activities/

Nice thanks Mike! Great summary of the stats. Unfortunately the share buttons do not work for me. Is it only me ? They only open the same site again in a popup window :(

~Stephan
January 06
On Friday, 6 January 2017 at 14:54:45 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
> https://dlang.org/blog/2016/06/03/recent-d-foundation-activities/

errr I think you mean this url:

https://dlang.org/blog/2017/01/06/the-d-blog-in-2016-seven-months-page-views/
January 06
On Friday, 6 January 2017 at 14:54:45 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
> I've always enjoyed reading end-of-the year stats at other blogs. I thought it would be fun to do the same for the D Blog. If you've been curious about which posts visitors are viewing, or which links they're clicking, this post is for you.
>
> https://dlang.org/blog/2016/06/03/recent-d-foundation-activities/

Hi Mike.  I was going to try and contact you directly, but since I've been unable to search down contact info on, I will post here.   I recently wrote a review of the 2016 GSoC (from admin perspective), and wanted to post it somewhere.  I thought perhaps a guest article on the blog might be appropriate - it isn't very exciting reading from a technical standpoint, but might be of general interest to the community. Anyway, if you would like me to submit it as a guest article that would to great, otherwise I will likely put it on the Wiki or on the forums.

You can contact me by email (or reply here) I have a gmail account: craig.dillabaugh
January 06
On Friday, 6 January 2017 at 14:58:59 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
> On Friday, 6 January 2017 at 14:54:45 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
>> https://dlang.org/blog/2016/06/03/recent-d-foundation-activities/
>
> errr I think you mean this url:
>
> https://dlang.org/blog/2017/01/06/the-d-blog-in-2016-seven-months-page-views/

Thanks!
January 06
On Friday, 6 January 2017 at 15:05:30 UTC, Craig Dillabaugh wrote:

>
> You can contact me by email (or reply here) I have a gmail account: craig.dillabaugh

I was going to contact you about the preparations GSoC 2017, anyway, but this is great, too. I'll drop you a line shortly.
January 06
On Friday, 6 January 2017 at 14:58:14 UTC, extrawurst wrote:

>
> Nice thanks Mike! Great summary of the stats. Unfortunately the share buttons do not work for me. Is it only me ? They only open the same site again in a popup window :(
>
> ~Stephan

Ah, they're definitely broken. I'll see what I can find out.

January 06
On Friday, 6 January 2017 at 14:54:45 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
> I've always enjoyed reading end-of-the year stats at other blogs. I thought it would be fun to do the same for the D Blog. If you've been curious about which posts visitors are viewing, or which links they're clicking, this post is for you.
>
> https://dlang.org/blog/2016/06/03/recent-d-foundation-activities/

Thanks for all the work you've done on this. It's a great marketing tool for the language, in addition to good reading.
January 06
On Friday, 6 January 2017 at 14:54:45 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
> I've always enjoyed reading end-of-the year stats at other blogs. I thought it would be fun to do the same for the D Blog. If you've been curious about which posts visitors are viewing, or which links they're clicking, this post is for you.
>
> https://dlang.org/blog/2016/06/03/recent-d-foundation-activities/

Don't forget that the majority of programmers use ad and tracking blockers, so I would multiply the view count by at least two to get a more accurate number.