Index » D » DMD 0.65 release (page 2)

May 13, 2003
Russ Lewis wrote in message:
>
>/usr/bin/ld: /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-redhat-linux/3.2.2/../../../libphobos.a(gc.o): bad relocation section name '.rel.gnu.linkonce.t_d_new? '
>
>
>
>I rechecked *again* that this is the right libphobos.a.  It *is* the 0.65 version.
>
>Anybody else here using RH9?
>

I'm not using RH9, but Slackware 9 with the same compiler (3.2.2) gives me the same error. Its the only dmd install on the machine, so it is definately the 0.65 libphobos.a

FWIW, I'm also getting the object.d not found error.

-Jon

BTW, I can't complain about these errors without telling Walter thanks for the Linux port!

>
>Walter wrote:
>
>> "Russ Lewis" <spamhole-2001-07-16@deming-os.org> wrote in message news:3EC12FAE.53234B7E@deming-os.org...
>> > GAHK!  Either the -f switch of the 'ln' command is broken, or I am
>> seriously
>> > confused about what it is for.  "ln -sf 0.65 cur" didn't change my link,
>> so I
>> > was continuing to use all of the old stuff!
>> >
>> > However....on RH 9, I still get the "bad relocation symbol" error.
>>
>> For what symbol?
>
>--
>The Villagers are Online! villagersonline.com
>
>.[ (the fox.(quick,brown)) jumped.over(the dog.lazy) ]
>.[ (a version.of(English).(precise.more)) is(possible) ]
>?[ you want.to(help(develop(it))) ]
>
>


May 13, 2003
On Tue, 13 May 2003 13:58:19 -0700, John Reimer wrote:

> On Tue, 13 May 2003 09:39:21 -0700, Walter wrote:
> 
>> 
>> Please double check that you put the new libphobos.a in /usr/lib. I double checked it, and the section name is correct in the archive I uploaded. If that doesn't work, try extracting gc.o from /usr/lib/libphobos.a and run dumpobj on it. Look at the section name for d_new.
> 
> Yes, libphobos.a is indeed in /usr/lib.  I copied the file there instead
> of sym linking.  I did run a dumpobj on libphobos.a earlier and couldn't find
> any references to that section name.
> 
> I imagine extracting and analyzing gc.o would amount to less voluminous searching.  Excuse my ignorance, but how do I extract gc.o from libphobos.a.  Does '.rel.gnu.linkonce.t_d_new?' really exist in there somewhere?

I should add that being able to run DMD without erros on Gentoo linux would be a
wonderful perk, but I'm not extremely surprised if it doesn't.  This is a
pre-release system that I update daily with recompiled, CPU-optimized toolsets.
As a result it's not near as stable as the redhat versions.  All the
toolsets are pretty much the most recent versions -- some of them beta.
So the fact that dmd got this far is still encouraging.
May 13, 2003
Please, what is the exact size of the libphobos.a file?

"Russ Lewis" <spamhole-2001-07-16@deming-os.org> wrote in message news:3EC157AB.3E76A465@deming-os.org...
> "Bad relocation section," sorry.  It's the same as I've posted in another thread:
>
>
>
> /usr/bin/ld: /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-redhat-linux/3.2.2/../../../libphobos.a(gc.o): bad relocation section name '.rel.gnu.linkonce.t_d_new? '
>
>
>
> I rechecked *again* that this is the right libphobos.a.  It *is* the 0.65 version.
>
> Anybody else here using RH9?


May 13, 2003
"John Reimer" <jjreimer@telus.net> wrote in message news:pan.2003.05.13.20.58.18.179613@telus.net...
> On Tue, 13 May 2003 09:39:21 -0700, Walter wrote:
> > Please double check that you put the new libphobos.a in /usr/lib. I
double
> > checked it, and the section name is correct in the archive I uploaded.
If
> > that doesn't work, try extracting gc.o from /usr/lib/libphobos.a and run dumpobj on it. Look at the section name for d_new.
>
> Yes, libphobos.a is indeed in /usr/lib.  I copied the file there instead of sym linking.  I did run a dumpobj on libphobos.a earlier and couldn't
find
> any references to that section name.
>
> I imagine extracting and analyzing gc.o would amount to less voluminous searching.  Excuse my ignorance, but how do I extract gc.o from libphobos.a.  Does '.rel.gnu.linkonce.t_d_new?' really exist in there somewhere?

Use:
    ar -x libphobos.a gc.o
Then run:
    dumpobj gc.o >log
please email me the log file.


May 13, 2003
[russ@deming-os russ]$ ls -lL /usr/lib/libphobos.a
-rw-rw-r--    1 russ     russ       379450 May 13 02:08 /usr/lib/libphobos.a
[russ@deming-os russ]$ ls -l /home/russ/d/*/dmd/lib/libphobos.a
-rw-rw-r--    1 russ     russ       379450 May 12 02:03
/home/russ/d/0.64/dmd/lib/libphobos.a
-rw-rw-r--    1 russ     russ       379450 May 13 02:08
/home/russ/d/0.65/dmd/lib/libphobos.a
-rw-rw-r--    1 russ     russ       379450 May 13 02:08
/home/russ/d/cur/dmd/lib/libphobos.a
[russ@deming-os russ]$



Walter wrote:

> Please, what is the exact size of the libphobos.a file?
>
> "Russ Lewis" <spamhole-2001-07-16@deming-os.org> wrote in message news:3EC157AB.3E76A465@deming-os.org...
> > "Bad relocation section," sorry.  It's the same as I've posted in another thread:
> >
> >
> >
> > /usr/bin/ld: /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-redhat-linux/3.2.2/../../../libphobos.a(gc.o): bad relocation section name '.rel.gnu.linkonce.t_d_new? '
> >
> >
> >
> > I rechecked *again* that this is the right libphobos.a.  It *is* the 0.65 version.
> >
> > Anybody else here using RH9?

--
The Villagers are Online! villagersonline.com

.[ (the fox.(quick,brown)) jumped.over(the dog.lazy) ]
.[ (a version.of(English).(precise.more)) is(possible) ]
?[ you want.to(help(develop(it))) ]


May 13, 2003
The other was on my RH7.2 machine (oops).  But I have precisely the same result
on my RH9 machine.



[russ@russ russ]$ ls -lL /usr/lib/libphobos.a
-rw-rw-r--    1 russ     russ       379450 May 13 02:08 /usr/lib/libphobos.a
[russ@russ russ]$ ls -l /home/russ/d/*/dmd/lib/libphobos.a
-rw-rw-r--    1 russ     russ       379450 May 12 02:03
/home/russ/d/0.64/dmd/lib/libphobos.a
-rw-rw-r--    1 russ     russ       379450 May 13 02:08
/home/russ/d/0.65/dmd/lib/libphobos.a
-rw-rw-r--    1 russ     russ       379450 May 13 02:08
/home/russ/d/cur/dmd/lib/libphobos.a
[russ@russ russ]$



Walter wrote:

> Please, what is the exact size of the libphobos.a file?
>
> "Russ Lewis" <spamhole-2001-07-16@deming-os.org> wrote in message news:3EC157AB.3E76A465@deming-os.org...
> > "Bad relocation section," sorry.  It's the same as I've posted in another thread:
> >
> >
> >
> > /usr/bin/ld: /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-redhat-linux/3.2.2/../../../libphobos.a(gc.o): bad relocation section name '.rel.gnu.linkonce.t_d_new? '
> >
> >
> >
> > I rechecked *again* that this is the right libphobos.a.  It *is* the 0.65 version.
> >
> > Anybody else here using RH9?

--
The Villagers are Online! villagersonline.com

.[ (the fox.(quick,brown)) jumped.over(the dog.lazy) ]
.[ (a version.of(English).(precise.more)) is(possible) ]
?[ you want.to(help(develop(it))) ]


May 14, 2003
> 
> Use:
>     ar -x libphobos.a gc.o
> Then run:
>     dumpobj gc.o >log
> please email me the log file.

Thanks Walter,

I just got back from work. I went ahead and did the above on the libphobos.a that resides in the /usr/lib directory.

Email with attachment on its way.  The relocation section,
.rel.gnu.linkonce.t_d_new, was viewable in the dumpobj of gc.o this time, but I
don't understand it enough to see what's wrong, so hopefully you can sort
it out.

Hope that helps.

Thanks,

John


May 14, 2003
On Tue, 13 May 2003 14:28:00 -0700, Walter wrote:

> Use:
>     ar -x libphobos.a gc.o
> Then run:
>     dumpobj gc.o >log
> please email me the log file.

Under section 9 of the log file, there is a hex dump in which
.rel.gnu.linkonce.t_d_new shows up twice, one after the other.
all the symbols appear to be separated by 0x00 0x2e normally.  The first
t_d_new, though, adds the two other numbers that Olaf pointed out
earlier in 0.64. That is, 0xa8 and 0x04 are appended to it still.

Man, those are neat tools. :-)

May 14, 2003
> Under section 9 of the log file, there is a hex dump in which
> .rel.gnu.linkonce.t_d_new shows up twice, one after the other.
> all the symbols appear to be separated by 0x00 0x2e normally.  The first
> t_d_new, though, adds the two other numbers that Olaf pointed out
> earlier in 0.64. That is, 0xa8 and 0x04 are appended to it still.
> 
> Man, those are neat tools. :-)

Eureka!  Thanks Walter. Everything builds with no errors now.  I haven't the faintest idea how I got the old libphobos.a in there.  I really thought I had been careful to delete the old and copy the new.  The one you sent me worked perfectly in /usr/lib.

Thanks again (and sorry for all that trouble :-P)

Later,

John
May 14, 2003
Cannot compile dhry.

[georg@abit d]$ dmd -I/home/georg/dmd/src/phobos dhry
gcc dhry.o -o dhry -lphobos -lpthread -lm
/usr/bin/ld: /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-redhat-linux/3.2/../../../libphobos.a(gc.o):
bad relocation section name `.rel.gnu.linkonce.t_d_new?'
dhry.o: In function `_Ddhry_dtime_FZd':
dhry.o(.gnu.linkonce.t_Ddhry_dtime_FZd+0x16): undefined reference to
`_imp__GetTickCount@0'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
--- errorlevel 256


A terminal log of installation and compilation is attached.


1 2 3
Top | Discussion index | About this forum | D home