This (incorrect) code

void TStatusData::TStatusData (wxTraceList * pDataList)
{

resulted in a gpf (win XP) in scppn.exe, which when closed gave anerror
beginning

child.cpp(272) : Error: illegal constructor or destructor or invariant
declaration

chris

"chris elliott" <biol75@york.ac.uk> wrote in message news:bdv5ui$78n$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> This (incorrect) code
>
> void TStatusData::TStatusData (wxTraceList * pDataList)
> {
>
> resulted in a gpf (win XP) in scppn.exe, which when closed gave anerror
> beginning
>
> child.cpp(272) : Error: illegal constructor or destructor or invariant
> declaration

If you can whittle it down to the minimum source which produces the error, and email it to me, I can fix it. -Walter

>If you can whittle it down to the minimum source which produces the error, and email it to me, I can fix it. -Walter

Walter,

I'm investigating 'Internal error: eh 684'  when compiling the ACE library's OS.cpp with -Ae.

I've got the cpp below 200 lines, but I think there's 10k lines of headers coming in before. Most of which is irrelevant, but its painful to cut down.

Is a zip or tarball of the files from the ACE release OK?

James

(Hmm - and this is a DMC from dmc834c.zip, but when I run it, it says 8.29n.
????)

<james@westongold.com> wrote in message news:bf4jkk$aq7$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> >If you can whittle it down to the minimum source which produces the
error,
> >and email it to me, I can fix it. -Walter
>
> Walter,
>
> I'm investigating 'Internal error: eh 684'  when compiling the ACE
library's
> OS.cpp with -Ae.
>
> I've got the cpp below 200 lines, but I think there's 10k lines of headers coming in before. Most of which is irrelevant, but its painful to cut
down.

Usually, the larger the test case, the longer it takes me to fix it.

> Is a zip or tarball of the files from the ACE release OK?

zip is better.

> (Hmm - and this is a DMC from dmc834c.zip, but when I run it, it says
8.29n.
> ????)

Type scppn to get the compiler version.

>Usually, the larger the test case, the longer it takes me to fix it.

OK, its cut down a long way now, I'll mail it later.  I just grabbed the beta compiler so I'll try it with that first.

Its just a 100 lines.

>Type scppn to get the compiler version.

OK it says 8.34.12n.
But, it IS very confusing that the literal text output by 'dmc' does not pick up
the same info.  It might be better to remove the version info completely, rather
than output something misleading.

James