Thread overview
[Bug 125] Optimizer produces faulty code
May 16, 2014
Ketmar Dark
May 18, 2014
Iain Buclaw
May 19, 2014
Ketmar Dark
May 19, 2014
Ketmar Dark
Jun 14, 2014
Ketmar Dark
Jul 21, 2014
Iain Buclaw
Jul 21, 2014
Iain Buclaw
Jul 21, 2014
Iain Buclaw
Jul 21, 2014
Iain Buclaw
May 16, 2014
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125

Ketmar Dark <ketmar@ketmar.no-ip.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |ketmar@ketmar.no-ip.org

--- Comment #1 from Ketmar Dark <ketmar@ketmar.no-ip.org> ---
Actually, optimizer produces faulty code for main.d, not for jsvar.d. it's ok to compile jsvar.d with -O2, but main.d with -O2 will segfault.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.


May 18, 2014
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125

--- Comment #2 from Iain Buclaw <ibuclaw@gdcproject.org> ---
I can't say I can reproduce this problem easily.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.


May 19, 2014
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125

--- Comment #3 from Ketmar Dark <ketmar@ketmar.no-ip.org> ---
sorry, i can't reduce it to small sample. but it's surely reproducable with 83b13e and gcc 4.9. i can attach that jsvar.d too (but it's really stock one from git) and anything you need to reproduce it. note that it's 32-bit compiler. i can't test it on 64 bit.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.


May 19, 2014
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125

--- Comment #4 from Ketmar Dark <ketmar@ketmar.no-ip.org> ---
just build jsvar.d, and then my main.d with -O2 — and you'll get segfault. it's not heisenbug.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.


June 14, 2014
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125

--- Comment #5 from Ketmar Dark <ketmar@ketmar.no-ip.org> ---
this bug disappeared in current gdc 4.9, so i think that it can be closed as "unconfirmed", 'cause even I can't reproduce it anymore.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.


July 21, 2014
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125

--- Comment #6 from Iain Buclaw <ibuclaw@gdcproject.org> ---
Bleh, lets just say worksforme.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.


July 21, 2014
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125

Iain Buclaw <ibuclaw@gdcproject.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |WORKSFORME

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.


July 21, 2014
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125

Iain Buclaw <ibuclaw@gdcproject.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |WORKSFORME

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.


July 21, 2014
http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125

Iain Buclaw <ibuclaw@gdcproject.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|RESOLVED                    |UNCONFIRMED
         Resolution|WORKSFORME                  |---
     Ever confirmed|1                           |0

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.