http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153

Ketmar Dark <ketmar@ketmar.no-ip.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |ketmar@ketmar.no-ip.org

--- Comment #1 from Ketmar Dark <ketmar@ketmar.no-ip.org> ---
Created attachment 75
  --> http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/attachment.cgi?id=75&action=edit
quick-and-dirty hack that adds option -fwrite-pragma-libs=

i attached a very quick and dirty hack that implements my proposal. my own build system already uses it, and i'm really happy. ;-)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.

http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153

--- Comment #2 from Ketmar Dark <ketmar@ketmar.no-ip.org> ---
p.s. seems that this should go to DMD bugtracker (as it touches frontend too),
but i'm pretty sure that it will be rejected. ;-)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.

http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153

--- Comment #3 from Iain Buclaw <ibuclaw@gdcproject.org> ---
This can be done instead in the backend, so that is OK.  (Bonus points, no need for a frontend global.option flag either)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.

http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153

--- Comment #4 from Ketmar Dark <ketmar@ketmar.no-ip.org> ---
Created attachment 76
  --> http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/attachment.cgi?id=76&action=edit
new quick-and-dirty patch

oh, yes, i'm soooo stupid. here is new patch which touches only backend. additionally, it emits more informative warning if there is no "-fwrite-pragma-libs=" option and no warning at all if the option is given.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.