| Thread overview | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
February 28, 2016 [Issue 15590] 0 coverage should be ignored in __ctfe branches | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15590 b2.temp@gmx.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |INVALID Summary|the coverage fails in |0 coverage should be |__ctfe branches |ignored in __ctfe branches --- Comment #1 from b2.temp@gmx.com --- Since coverage is generated by the target application, it cannot know if the compiler has run it. -- | ||||
February 28, 2016 [Issue 15590] 0 coverage should be ignored in __ctfe branches | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15590 b2.temp@gmx.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|INVALID |--- -- | ||||
June 17, 2020 [Issue 15590] 0 coverage should be ignored in __ctfe branches | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15590 Basile-z <b2.temp@gmx.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|REOPENED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE --- Comment #2 from Basile-z <b2.temp@gmx.com> --- *** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of issue 20931 *** -- | ||||
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation
Permalink
Reply