Thread overview
[Issue 15590] 0 coverage should be ignored in __ctfe branches
Feb 28, 2016
b2.temp@gmx.com
Feb 28, 2016
b2.temp@gmx.com
Jun 17, 2020
Basile-z
February 28, 2016
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15590

b2.temp@gmx.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |INVALID
            Summary|the coverage fails in       |0 coverage should be
                   |__ctfe branches             |ignored in __ctfe branches

--- Comment #1 from b2.temp@gmx.com ---
Since coverage is generated by the target application, it cannot know if the compiler has run it.

--
February 28, 2016
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15590

b2.temp@gmx.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|RESOLVED                    |REOPENED
         Resolution|INVALID                     |---

--
June 17, 2020
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15590

Basile-z <b2.temp@gmx.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|REOPENED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |DUPLICATE

--- Comment #2 from Basile-z <b2.temp@gmx.com> ---


*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of issue 20931 ***

--