https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18106

--- Comment #1 from Ketmar Dark <ketmar@ketmar.no-ip.org> ---
it's not *technically* incorrect: `@nogc:` affects *all* followind definitions, including lambdas. thus, in the second case, we actually have `auto __lambda () @nogc { new int(5); }`, and compiler complains.

--

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18106

Ketmar Dark <ketmar@ketmar.no-ip.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |ketmar@ketmar.no-ip.org

--- Comment #2 from Ketmar Dark <ketmar@ketmar.no-ip.org> ---
`return new int(5);`, of course, sorry.

--

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18106

--- Comment #3 from Eyal <eyal@weka.io> ---
It does not affect other kinds of nested scopes.

For example, this does compile:

auto ignoreDlg(void function() dlg) {}
@nogc: struct S { void foo() { ignoreDlg(() { new int(5); }); } }

--

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18106

--- Comment #4 from Ketmar Dark <ketmar@ketmar.no-ip.org> ---
yes, `struct` (and `class`, i believe) isn't affected. outer @nogc for *struct*
(and class) doesn't change member attrs, only inner @nogc does. this is the
logic compiler applies. ;-)

i'm still not sure if `@nogc` should do the same thing as `@nogc:` or not, tho. it prolly should, but let's wait for some compiler dev to clarify the things.

--

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18106

--- Comment #5 from Eyal <eyal@weka.io> ---
It makes no sense at all for "@nogc" to apply to statements within a statement block of a function.

It would only make sense if it applied recursively to *all* nested scopes.

--

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18106

timon.gehr@gmx.ch changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |timon.gehr@gmx.ch

--- Comment #6 from timon.gehr@gmx.ch ---
This is a more general problem, applying to other function attributes as well as @nogc.

The pull request below should be reverted as soon as this issue is fixed (it is
an ugly hack fixing the problem only for the `static foreach` lowering and only
for @nogc):
https://github.com/dlang/dmd/pull/9922/commits/0a65ef981578e263a380f6df4668572dce0a52d6

--

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18106

Iain Buclaw <ibuclaw@gdcproject.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Priority|P3                          |P2

--