Thread overview | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
April 15, 2018 [Bug 290] ice-on-valid: Assertion `fd->semanticRun == PASSsemantic3done' failed. | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
https://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=290 Iain Buclaw <ibuclaw@gdcproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #1 from Iain Buclaw <ibuclaw@gdcproject.org> --- Not reproducible on master, may have been a frontend bug that was backported from the 2.076-compat patches. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. |
April 15, 2018 [Bug 290] ice-on-valid: Assertion `fd->semanticRun == PASSsemantic3done' failed. | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
https://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=290 --- Comment #2 from Sebastien Alaiwan <sebastien.alaiwan@gmail.com> --- (In reply to Iain Buclaw from comment #1) > Not reproducible on master, may have been a frontend bug that was backported from the 2.076-compat patches. Yeah, maybe ; please keep in mind this one is highly volatile. For example, I can prevent the problem from manifesting itself by simply deleting the declaration of the (unused) structure "Context". The error might still be present on master (but would need a slightly different test case). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. |
April 16, 2018 [Bug 290] ice-on-valid: Assertion `fd->semanticRun == PASSsemantic3done' failed. | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
https://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=290 --- Comment #3 from Iain Buclaw <ibuclaw@gdcproject.org> --- (In reply to Sebastien Alaiwan from comment #2) > (In reply to Iain Buclaw from comment #1) > > Not reproducible on master, may have been a frontend bug that was backported from the 2.076-compat patches. > > Yeah, maybe ; please keep in mind this one is highly volatile. > > For example, I can prevent the problem from manifesting itself by simply deleting the declaration of the (unused) structure "Context". > > The error might still be present on master (but would need a slightly > different test case). Can this be reproduced in any version of dmd between 2.068 and 2.076? That would be one way to check, but as this is not a context-free test, it could even be that library changes made the bug go away. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. |
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation