"Kris" <someidiot@earthlink.dot.dot.dot.net> wrote in message news:c673fo$2u1p$1@digitaldaemon.com...
>
> "Matthew" <matthew.hat@stlsoft.dot.org> wrote in message news:c66s9i$2hv9$3@digitaldaemon.com...
> > I think this is going to have to be done, as I'm drowning under the
> volume, and I
> > know Walter's having trouble keeping me supplied with hourly compiler
> updates <G>
> > because of it.
> >
> > I don't know what I would suggest, but I think at the least we should
have
> > D.newbies and D.bugs groups.
> >
> > Votes?
> >
>
> | For
> | -------
>
> Matthew
> J Anderson
> J C Calvarese
> Unknown
> Ant
> Stephan Wienczny
> C. Sauls
> Carlos Santander
> Kris
   Scott Egan
>
> | Against
> | -------
>
>

   Need to at least split library & lang and then maybe bugs, hopes ;)  &
questions
d                    <- general
d.lang
d.lang.bugs
d.lang.wishes
d.lib
d.lib.phobos
d.lib.phobos.bugs
etc (room for growth, after all one day this will be bigger than MS)

"Matthew" <matthew.hat@stlsoft.dot.org> wrote in message news:c66s9i$2hv9$3@digitaldaemon.com...
> I think this is going to have to be done, as I'm drowning under the
volume, and I
> know Walter's having trouble keeping me supplied with hourly compiler
updates <G>
> because of it.
>
> I don't know what I would suggest, but I think at the least we should have D.newbies and D.bugs groups.
>
> Votes?
>
> For
> ---
Im definately for the newbies, but do you think
that everyone will post their bugs to D.bugs,
and not everywhere?
Maybe it would be just harder to find them, when
not everyone would be aware of the D.bugs
group?
Phill.

> Matthew
>
> Against
> -------
>
>


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.659 / Virus Database: 423 - Release Date: 4/15/2004

Scott Egan wrote:

<snip>
> d                    <- general
> d.lang
> d.lang.bugs

For bugs in the language spec (i.e. Walter wrote what he didn't mean)?

> d.lang.wishes
> d.lib
> d.lib.phobos
> d.lib.phobos.bugs
> etc (room for growth, after all one day this will be bigger than MS)

I'd at least add:

d.dmd
d.dmd.bugs

Or maybe

d.compiler.dmd
d.compiler.dmd.bugs

if we're going to provide a place to discuss other compilers that may come into being, comparisions between compilers, and implementation theory...

Stewart.

-- 
My e-mail is valid but not my primary mailbox, aside from its being the unfortunate victim of intensive mail-bombing at the moment.  Please keep replies on the 'group where everyone may benefit.

Matthew schrieb:
> d.intro

d.invtro, d.intro, d.demo, d.outro

-eye

Minor issue
Another thing that I don't think has been mentioned is that we eventually plan to move D to usenet .  I guess this group would be the usenet group.  If we split the group up, there is confusion (at least on my part) of where to send the messages. 

Parhaps this group should be kept and the other suggested groups be added.  When we move to usenet this group could be closed down, if it is possible to upload all the archives.  Or at least promote the use of the usenet group.  I wouldn't want the D community to split up.

-- 
-Anderson: http://badmama.com.au/~anderson/