View mode: basic / threaded / horizontal-split · Log in · Help
May 21, 2004
Re: Three improvements for constructor syntax
After reading this thread for a while I'd to chime in.
I agree with Arcane Jill point. My motivation is this I'd like D to be a simple
language as possible. Easy to read, easy to write, easy to understand, easy to
maintain, and ofcourse, easy on the compiler. And every unnecessary rule should
be depricated away. Rule such as: new, brace as block of code, class, and
function, semicolon as end of statement. I'll could think of more.

vanh
May 21, 2004
Re: Three improvements for constructor syntax
Oop! me bad. I double click on the postmessage. Sorry for that.
Vanh



>After reading this thread for a while I'd to chime in.
>I agree with Arcane Jill point. My motivation is this I'd like D to be a simple
>language as possible. Easy to read, easy to write, easy to understand, easy to
>maintain, and ofcourse, easy on the compiler. And every unnecessary rule should
>be depricated away. Rule such as: new, brace as block of code, class, and
>function, semicolon as end of statement. I'll could think of more.
>
>vanh
>
>
Next ›   Last »
1 2 3
Top | Discussion index | About this forum | D home