March 30, 2017 Reading on D safety? | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Safety of C has been in the (hacker) news lately [0]. When I tried to tell people about D, I had no good link to share on the topic. The spec for @safe [1] is not comprehensive. The article of SafeD [2] is fluffy and without much meat. The C to D comparison is too much irrelevant stuff. I found nothing on the blog. The topic of safety is an important one imho. It comes up again and again. D has a good story to tell about being easier than Rust and safer than C++. How should this be addressed? A blog article? [0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13966241 [1] https://dlang.org/spec/function.html#function-safety [2] https://dlang.org/safed.html |
March 30, 2017 Re: Reading on D safety? | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to qznc | On 3/30/2017 5:48 AM, qznc wrote:
> The topic of safety is an important one imho. It comes up again and again. D has
> a good story to tell about being easier than Rust and safer than C++. How should
> this be addressed? A blog article?
I'll be presenting on the topic at DConf and will be following up with an article. I agree as to the importance of the topic.
|
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation