In article <ckpkqj$2sa3$1@digitaldaemon.com>, J C Calvarese says...
>
>larrycowan wrote:
>> In article <ckor2s$2586$1@digitaldaemon.com>, Rex Couture says...
>> 
>>>In article <ckmtds$am9$1@digitaldaemon.com>, Charles Hixson says...
>>>
>> 
>> Can anyone refer us back to something by Walter on this issue with meat in it? i.e., not just "that's the way it is", or "I'm carrying forward this from  C".
>
>Walter doesn't seem to see any big problems with the bit situation, so he hasn't said much on the issue. A lot of people have said a lot of things on the issue, but I haven't seen any consensus develop.
>
>In any case, I've found some of Walter's best posts on bit vs. bool and wiki-ized them: http://www.prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?BooleanNotEquBit/PostsByWalter
>
>Enjoy!
>
>-- 
>Justin (a/k/a jcc7)
>http://jcc_7.tripod.com/d/

Thanks.  So we have bools as 0:!0, and 0:1 bit arrays to store them but " '='does not give a boolean result " and he's hanging tight on all fronts - some I would side with and some not, but it is not going to move.  We can get onto more productive discussions.

The wiki4d is a great place to have faq stuff and this needed to be there. Again, thanks.