Thread overview | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
January 20, 2005 toStringz ? why not toCString ? or some thing similar ? | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Just curious, why toStringz is named that way, instead of say, toCString or toCStr ? The name toStringz doesn't obviously say what it does. Sai |
January 20, 2005 Re: toStringz ? why not toCString ? or some thing similar ? | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to ud | ok I got it ..... toString'z(ero)' !! In article <csmtpr$sq2$1@digitaldaemon.com>, ud says... > >Just curious, why toStringz is named that way, instead of say, toCString or toCStr ? The name toStringz doesn't obviously say what it does. > >Sai > > |
January 20, 2005 Re: toStringz ? why not toCString ? or some thing similar ? | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to ud | In article <csmtpr$sq2$1@digitaldaemon.com>, ud says... > >Just curious, why toStringz is named that way, instead of say, toCString or toCStr ? The name toStringz doesn't obviously say what it does. > >Sai > I had wondered that, too. Here's the thread: http://www.digitalmars.com/d/archives/18783.html |
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation