"Georg Wrede" <georg.wrede@nospam.org> wrote in message news:421461E4.5070004@nospam.org...
> Matthew wrote:
>> I wasn't looking at it in that way. I don't look at _any_ code on ng posts for bugworthiness. That's what I do in code reviews, or in development of code, or when determining whether or not a particular library has enough merit to bother unzipping it. On ngs, I assume we're talking 'concept' and glimpse code for its feel.
>>
>> Hence, I wouldn't read anything into my having not seen the bug, since I didn't even delve into what the code did. I took it in the spirit of the context of the discussion at that time.
>
> Oh, what a shame. I made such a great effort in introducing the two bugs. ;-)
>
> Honestly, I too read the examples here the way you do,
> but writing mine, I kinda forgot about it.
>
> (
> Not to mention the bugs i later found,
> that I didn't intend on.   ;-(
> )

He. nw. :-)