| Thread overview |
|---|
February 14, 2005 lib does not have a /NOL equivalent in 'modern' syntax? | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
 | At least I cannot find one.
Anyone?
Cheers
--
Matthew Wilson
Author: "Imperfect C++", Addison-Wesley, 2004
(http://www.imperfectcplusplus.com)
Contributing editor, C/C++ Users Journal
(http://www.synesis.com.au/articles.html#columns)
STLSoft moderator
(http://www.stlsoft.org)
"If I'm curt with you it's because time is a factor. I think fast, I talk fast, and I need you guys to act fast" -- Mr Wolf
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |||
Permalink
ReplyFebruary 14, 2005 Re: lib does not have a /NOL equivalent in 'modern' syntax? | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
 Posted in reply to Matthew | "Matthew" <admin@stlsoft.dot.dot.dot.dot.org> wrote in message news:cupll6$v2$1@digitaldaemon.com... > At least I cannot find one. > > Anyone? > > Cheers Well, no, there isn't one. Does it matter? | |||
February 14, 2005 Re: lib does not have a /NOL equivalent in 'modern' syntax? | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Walter | Yes, it's making my DMC++ builds unnecessarily 'busy' on the eye! All the other compilers provide facilities for having a minimal amount of output, but DMC++'s LIB is not playing ball. "Walter" <newshound@digitalmars.com> wrote in message news:cupm3s$28r$1@digitaldaemon.com... > > "Matthew" <admin@stlsoft.dot.dot.dot.dot.org> wrote in message news:cupll6$v2$1@digitaldaemon.com... >> At least I cannot find one. >> >> Anyone? >> >> Cheers > > Well, no, there isn't one. Does it matter? > > | |||
February 25, 2005 Re: lib does not have a /NOL equivalent in 'modern' syntax? | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Matthew | "Matthew" <admin@stlsoft.dot.dot.dot.dot.org> wrote in message news:cupq48$8jh$1@digitaldaemon.com... > Yes, it's making my DMC++ builds unnecessarily 'busy' on the eye! > > All the other compilers provide facilities for having a minimal amount of output, but DMC++'s LIB is not playing ball. Well, you can always use the old syntax. | |||
February 27, 2005 Re: lib does not have a /NOL equivalent in 'modern' syntax? | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Walter | No chance of adding -nologo to the new? "Walter" <newshound@digitalmars.com> wrote in message news:cvmcdq$2qt3$3@digitaldaemon.com... > > "Matthew" <admin@stlsoft.dot.dot.dot.dot.org> wrote in message news:cupq48$8jh$1@digitaldaemon.com... >> Yes, it's making my DMC++ builds unnecessarily 'busy' on the eye! >> >> All the other compilers provide facilities for having a minimal >> amount >> of output, but DMC++'s LIB is not playing ball. > > Well, you can always use the old syntax. > > | |||
March 24, 2005 Re: lib does not have a /NOL equivalent in 'modern' syntax? | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Matthew | When I do an update, I'll add it. "Matthew" <admin@stlsoft.dot.dot.dot.dot.org> wrote in message news:cvrrkj$2bld$1@digitaldaemon.com... > No chance of adding -nologo to the new? > > "Walter" <newshound@digitalmars.com> wrote in message news:cvmcdq$2qt3$3@digitaldaemon.com... > > > > "Matthew" <admin@stlsoft.dot.dot.dot.dot.org> wrote in message news:cupq48$8jh$1@digitaldaemon.com... > >> Yes, it's making my DMC++ builds unnecessarily 'busy' on the eye! > >> > >> All the other compilers provide facilities for having a minimal > >> amount > >> of output, but DMC++'s LIB is not playing ball. > > > > Well, you can always use the old syntax. > > > > > > | |||
March 24, 2005 Re: lib does not have a /NOL equivalent in 'modern' syntax? | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Walter | Cool bananas! :-) "Walter" <newshound@digitalmars.com> wrote in message news:d1t21p$lhv$2@digitaldaemon.com... > When I do an update, I'll add it. > > "Matthew" <admin@stlsoft.dot.dot.dot.dot.org> wrote in message news:cvrrkj$2bld$1@digitaldaemon.com... >> No chance of adding -nologo to the new? >> >> "Walter" <newshound@digitalmars.com> wrote in message news:cvmcdq$2qt3$3@digitaldaemon.com... >> > >> > "Matthew" <admin@stlsoft.dot.dot.dot.dot.org> wrote in message news:cupq48$8jh$1@digitaldaemon.com... >> >> Yes, it's making my DMC++ builds unnecessarily 'busy' on the eye! >> >> >> >> All the other compilers provide facilities for having a minimal >> >> amount >> >> of output, but DMC++'s LIB is not playing ball. >> > >> > Well, you can always use the old syntax. >> > >> > >> >> > > | |||
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation