module tester;
import std.c.stdio;
import locks.reentrantlock;

class LockedIndex {
private ReentrantLock rlock;
private uint index;
this(int begin) {
rlock = new ReentrantLock;
index = begin;
}
int current() {
return index;
}
int getIx() {
int retn;
printf("A\n");
rlock.lock(); // block until lock is available
printf("B\n");
retn = index++;
if (retn >= 256*256)
retn = -1;
rlock.unlock(); // release the lock
return retn;
}
}

LockedIndex ixLock;

int main( char[][] args )
{
ixLock = new LockedIndex(42);

printf("begin @ %d\n",ixLock.current());

for (int i=0; i < 10 ;i++)
printf("%d: %d\n",i,ixLock.getIx());

printf("Done.\n");
return 0;
}
------------------------------
prints:
>begin @ 42
>A
>Error: Access Violation
------------------------------

What am I doing wrong?

> ------------------------------
> prints:
>>begin @ 42
>>A
>>Error: Access Violation
> ------------------------------
>
> What am I doing wrong?

Looks like a the locks.lib is corrupt. When I rebuild locks.lib without -O passed to the compiler everything works fine. That would explain why my unittests passed when I last updated it. I have updated the zip file with a locks.lib built without -O and I'll try to narrow down the problem to post to D.bugs for Walter to ponder.

-Ben

Thanks.
-larry

In article <d33in9$2d6o$1@digitaldaemon.com>, Ben Hinkle says...
>
>> ------------------------------
>> prints:
>>>begin @ 42
>>>A
>>>Error: Access Violation
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> What am I doing wrong?
>
>Looks like a the locks.lib is corrupt. When I rebuild locks.lib without -O passed to the compiler everything works fine. That would explain why my unittests passed when I last updated it. I have updated the zip file with a locks.lib built without -O and I'll try to narrow down the problem to post to D.bugs for Walter to ponder.
>
>-Ben
>
>