Jump to page: 1 29  
Page
Thread overview
no frames
Aug 22, 2005
Walter
Aug 22, 2005
Regan Heath
Aug 22, 2005
Don Clugston
Aug 22, 2005
Derek Parnell
Aug 22, 2005
zwang
Aug 22, 2005
Walter
Aug 22, 2005
Derek Parnell
Aug 22, 2005
ElfQT
Aug 23, 2005
Stewart Gordon
Aug 23, 2005
Derek Parnell
Aug 23, 2005
Stewart Gordon
Aug 24, 2005
Stewart Gordon
Aug 24, 2005
Stewart Gordon
Aug 25, 2005
Walter
Aug 26, 2005
Brad Anderson
Aug 23, 2005
Walter
Aug 22, 2005
John Demme
Aug 22, 2005
Uwe Salomon
Aug 22, 2005
Dejan Lekic
Aug 22, 2005
Uwe Salomon
Aug 22, 2005
Dejan Lekic
Aug 22, 2005
Walter
Aug 23, 2005
Ben Hinkle
Aug 22, 2005
bobef
Aug 22, 2005
pragma
Aug 22, 2005
Hasan Aljudy
Aug 22, 2005
Walter
Aug 23, 2005
zwang
Aug 23, 2005
AJG
Aug 23, 2005
J C Calvarese
Aug 23, 2005
Ameer Armaly
Aug 22, 2005
Lars Ivar Igesund
Aug 22, 2005
Carlos Smith
Aug 22, 2005
Walter
Aug 22, 2005
Regan Heath
Aug 22, 2005
Derek Parnell
Aug 23, 2005
zwang
Aug 23, 2005
James Dunne
Re: Fixed Navigation (was "no frames")
Aug 23, 2005
AJG
Aug 23, 2005
Walter
Aug 23, 2005
Walter
Aug 23, 2005
Ilya Zaitseff
Re: Fixed Navigation (was
Aug 23, 2005
AJG
Aug 24, 2005
Chris Sauls
Aug 24, 2005
pragma
Aug 25, 2005
pragma
Aug 26, 2005
James Dunne
Aug 23, 2005
Hasan Aljudy
Aug 23, 2005
Walter
Aug 23, 2005
Hasan Aljudy
Aug 23, 2005
ElfQT
Aug 22, 2005
Andrew Fedoniouk
Aug 22, 2005
Walter
Aug 23, 2005
AJG
Aug 23, 2005
Walter
Aug 23, 2005
AJG
Aug 23, 2005
Walter
Aug 23, 2005
AJG
Aug 23, 2005
Walter
Aug 23, 2005
AJG
Aug 23, 2005
Walter
Aug 23, 2005
J C Calvarese
Aug 23, 2005
Walter
Aug 23, 2005
clayasaurus
Aug 23, 2005
Walter
Re: no frames - (E.T. wants to go home)
Aug 24, 2005
David L. Davis
Aug 24, 2005
AJG
Aug 24, 2005
Walter
Aug 24, 2005
AJG
Aug 25, 2005
Walter
Aug 25, 2005
Chris Sauls
Aug 25, 2005
Walter
Aug 24, 2005
Dejan Lekic
August 22, 2005
Improvement? Keep it?

www.digitalmars.com/d/index.html


August 22, 2005
On Sun, 21 Aug 2005 22:23:22 -0700, Walter <newshound@digitalmars.com> wrote:

> www.digitalmars.com/d/index.html

I'm still seeing frames (meaning I have 2 menus).

The downside to not having the menu in a frame is that when you scroll the page you scroll the menu. Thus was born that abomination "the floating menu".

Regan
August 22, 2005
On Sun, 21 Aug 2005 22:23:22 -0700, Walter wrote:

> Improvement? Keep it?
> 
> www.digitalmars.com/d/index.html

Yes an improvement, though I didn't have a problem with frames. It looks cleaner, neater and pleasant. The thing I still miss is a decent index for each of the sections "Language" and "Phobos". Especially for Phobos as often I want to look up the details of a something and all I know is its name (or near enough) but not sure which module its in.

I suppose someone can write a quick program to read all the phobos files and generate some HTML as an index.

-- 
Derek
(skype: derek.j.parnell)
Melbourne, Australia
22/08/2005 4:38:50 PM
August 22, 2005
Regan Heath wrote:
> On Sun, 21 Aug 2005 22:23:22 -0700, Walter <newshound@digitalmars.com>  wrote:
> 
>> www.digitalmars.com/d/index.html
> 
> 
> I'm still seeing frames (meaning I have 2 menus).
> 
> The downside to not having the menu in a frame is that when you scroll the  page you scroll the menu. Thus was born that abomination "the floating  menu".
> 
> Regan

Regan,
It's only index.html that is still a frame.
 try
http://www.digitalmars.com/d/lex.html

Actually, the thing I really dislike about frames is when you link to an external site, eg the 'D links' page.

Huge improvement, IMHO.
I like it.



August 22, 2005
Derek Parnell wrote:
> On Sun, 21 Aug 2005 22:23:22 -0700, Walter wrote:
> 
> 
>>Improvement? Keep it?
>>
>>www.digitalmars.com/d/index.html
> 
> 
> Yes an improvement, though I didn't have a problem with frames. It looks
> cleaner, neater and pleasant. The thing I still miss is a decent index for
> each of the sections "Language" and "Phobos". Especially for Phobos as
> often I want to look up the details of a something and all I know is its
> name (or near enough) but not sure which module its in. 
> 
> I suppose someone can write a quick program to read all the phobos files
> and generate some HTML as an index. 
> 

I often run into the same situation. Without an index, I have to grep.
August 22, 2005
Improvement.  Keep it.

On Sun, 21 Aug 2005 22:23:22 -0700, Walter wrote:

> Improvement? Keep it?
> 
> www.digitalmars.com/d/index.html

August 22, 2005
"Derek Parnell" <derek@psych.ward> wrote in message news:w8hyxgsmjwsw.1ppqyva5z35bq$.dlg@40tude.net...
> I suppose someone can write a quick program to read all the phobos files and generate some HTML as an index.

Want to take a whack at it? It could be done as a melding of wc and the html preprocessor.


August 22, 2005
On Mon, 22 Aug 2005 07:23:22 +0200, Walter <newshound@digitalmars.com> wrote:

> Improvement? Keep it?

Yes, very good!

Ciao
uwe
August 22, 2005
On Mon, 22 Aug 2005 01:04:48 -0700, Walter wrote:

> "Derek Parnell" <derek@psych.ward> wrote in message news:w8hyxgsmjwsw.1ppqyva5z35bq$.dlg@40tude.net...
>> I suppose someone can write a quick program to read all the phobos files and generate some HTML as an index.
> 
> Want to take a whack at it? It could be done as a melding of wc and the html preprocessor.

Actually I've already started on something. It's a little more generic in that it will read a set of HTML files and produce a 'significant' word index for the whole set.

-- 
Derek
(skype: derek.j.parnell)
Melbourne, Australia
22/08/2005 6:35:45 PM
August 22, 2005
Mr. Bright,
IMHO You should redesign DM website according to design provided by Trevor
Parscal (he submitted it few months ago). - It was really superior design I
think. He also said he would volunteer to help You with it, but looks like
nothing happened. I know Mr. Parscall and all I can say is that he's very
skillfull guy (artist, musician, developer...).
I think no-frames version would be nice for search engines - so the best
would be to have both of them, and let visitor chose which one (s)he would
use.

Kind regards

Dejan

-- 
...........
Dejan Lekic
  http://dejan.lekic.org

« First   ‹ Prev
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9