http://www.digitalmars.com/drn-bin/wwwnews?digitalmars.D.bugs/4837

Instead, the generated binary will abort at run-time and give misleading message:


int f() {
return 0;  // gdc Error: AssertError Failure rtn.d(3); dmd Aborted
}

int main(char[][] args) {
f();
return 0;
}

>int f() {
>  // return 0;  // gdc Error: AssertError Failure rtn.d(3); dmd Aborted
---^^
need to comment out line 3 to see the error.

>}
>
>int main(char[][] args) {
>f();
>return 0;
>}
>
>

z@gg.com wrote:
> http://www.digitalmars.com/drn-bin/wwwnews?digitalmars.D.bugs/4837
<snip>

Thank you for confessing your sin.

http://smjg.port5.com/faqs/usenet/xpost.html

Stewart.

-- 
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.1
GCS/M d- s:- a->--- UB@ P+ L E@ W++@ N+++ o K- w++@ O? M V? PS- PE- Y? PGP- t- 5? X? R b DI? D G e++>++++ h-- r-- !y
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------

My e-mail is valid but not my primary mailbox.  Please keep replies on the 'group where everyone may benefit.

>Thank you for confessing your sin.
>
>http://smjg.port5.com/faqs/usenet/xpost.html

(Yes, it is intentionally done!  Thank you for mis-interpreting it.)

I'm cross-posting to make sure that gdc guys know this is a common bug.

Ideally, we have 2 compilers now, so we should have 3 bug lists:

D.gdc.bugs
D.dmd.bugs
D.gdc-dmd-common.bugs

z@gg.com wrote:
>> Thank you for confessing your sin.
>>
>> http://smjg.port5.com/faqs/usenet/xpost.html
> 
> (Yes, it is intentionally done!  Thank you for mis-interpreting it.)
> 
> I'm cross-posting to make sure that gdc guys know this is a common bug.
<snip>

If you'd followed the link above, you'd know that you haven't crossposted.  You've multiposted.

Stewart.

-- 
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.1
GCS/M d- s:- a->--- UB@ P+ L E@ W++@ N+++ o K- w++@ O? M V? PS- PE- Y? PGP- t- 5? X? R b DI? D G e++>++++ h-- r-- !y
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------

My e-mail is valid but not my primary mailbox.  Please keep replies on the 'group where everyone may benefit.