February 16, 2006
Hello,

I'm asking myself for a few days now if it'd be possible to call native D functions (without "extern(C)") directly out of an assembler module (compiled with nasm, for example). As far as I know D has a little different function naming convention than C, so it would be interesting if there's a static definition of how native functions are named.

I didn't find any information on the official D site, so I thought it'd be a good idea to ask in the newsgroup so Walter or some uber-mighty D coder could have a chance to answer.

Thanks in advance and regards,
Alex
February 16, 2006
Alexander Panek wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I'm asking myself for a few days now if it'd be possible to call native D functions (without "extern(C)") directly out of an assembler module (compiled with nasm, for example). As far as I know D has a little different function naming convention than C, so it would be interesting if there's a static definition of how native functions are named.

In the same vein, it might be nice if we could forward-declare functions defined in other modules.


Sean
February 16, 2006
I think you can, if you make them static class members <g>

class Utils
{
    static int myFunc(int);
    static bool myOtherFunc(int);
}


"Sean Kelly" <sean@f4.ca> wrote in message news:dt2rug$1b1p$2@digitaldaemon.com...
> Alexander Panek wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'm asking myself for a few days now if it'd be possible to call native D functions (without "extern(C)") directly out of an assembler module (compiled with nasm, for example). As far as I know D has a little different function naming convention than C, so it would be interesting if there's a static definition of how native functions are named.
>
> In the same vein, it might be nice if we could forward-declare functions defined in other modules.
>
>
> Sean


February 16, 2006
"Alexander Panek" <alexander.panek@brainsware.org> wrote in message news:dt2jtu$14qu$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> I'm asking myself for a few days now if it'd be possible to call native D functions (without "extern(C)") directly out of an assembler module (compiled with nasm, for example).

Sure. In order to see how to do it, call the function in D. Then, obj2asm the resulting .obj file, that'll tell you the name mangling and the calling convention.


February 21, 2006
Alexander Panek wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I'm asking myself for a few days now if it'd be possible to call native D functions (without "extern(C)") directly out of an assembler module (compiled with nasm, for example). As far as I know D has a little different function naming convention than C, so it would be interesting if there's a static definition of how native functions are named.

import std.stdio;

// put your function here...
char [] f(int a, Whatever w)
{
}

void main()
{
    writefln( f.mangleof);
}


> 
> I didn't find any information on the official D site, so I thought it'd be a good idea to ask in the newsgroup so Walter or some uber-mighty D coder could have a chance to answer.
> 
> Thanks in advance and regards,
> Alex
Top | Discussion index | About this forum | D home