Hi, I am interested to purchase the CD ROM in oder to use DMC++ and
wxWidgets.2.62( I  also need the debugger for D)
Has anybody success in building the wxWidgets release DLLs, LIBs. ?
Exists there a step by step instruction?
Thanks in advance
bjoern

BLS wrote:
> Hi, I am interested to purchase the CD ROM in oder to use DMC++ and
> wxWidgets.2.62( I  also need the debugger for D)
> Has anybody success in building the wxWidgets release DLLs, LIBs. ?
> Exists there a step by step instruction?
> Thanks in advance
> bjoern
> 
> 

I use wxw-2.4.x and wxw-2.6.x mainly with DMC. (No wxw DLL's yet though.)

Arjan

thanks arjan,
still wondering why wxWidgets is not official part of DMC.

bjoern


"Arjan" <arjan@ask.me> schreef in bericht
news:dtudtd$p9h$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> BLS wrote:
> > Hi, I am interested to purchase the CD ROM in oder to use DMC++ and
> > wxWidgets.2.62( I  also need the debugger for D)
> > Has anybody success in building the wxWidgets release DLLs, LIBs. ?
> > Exists there a step by step instruction?
> > Thanks in advance
> > bjoern
> >
> >
>
> I use wxw-2.4.x and wxw-2.6.x mainly with DMC. (No wxw DLL's yet though.)
>
> Arjan

Arjan wrote:
> BLS wrote:
> 
>> Hi, I am interested to purchase the CD ROM in oder to use DMC++ and
>> wxWidgets.2.62( I  also need the debugger for D)
>> Has anybody success in building the wxWidgets release DLLs, LIBs. ?
>> Exists there a step by step instruction?
>> Thanks in advance
>> bjoern
>>
>>
> 
> I use wxw-2.4.x and wxw-2.6.x mainly with DMC. (No wxw DLL's yet though.)
> 
> Arjan

DLL's are nice, but I suspect more than MFC wxWidgets's DLL's might 
suffer from DLL hell issue's. I.e. application 1 using 2.6.2 in 
wxcore26.dll and applcation 2 using 2.6.4 in wxcore26.dll...

Jan



-- 
ManiaC++
Jan Knepper

But as for me and my household, we shall use Mozilla...
www.mozilla.org

the dll issue can be solved easily with the VENDOR string, which can be defined
when building the wxWidgets library as dll,

use VENDOR=wx263 when building

e.g.
smake -f makefile.dms BUILD=release SHARED=1 MONOLITHIC=1 USE_XRC=1 UNICODE=1
VENDOR=wx263

and you get a

wxmsw26u_dmc_wx263.dll

then you're out of dll-hell ;-)

== Quote from Jan Knepper (jan@smartsoft.us)'s article
> DLL's are nice, but I suspect more than MFC wxWidgets's DLL's might
> suffer from DLL hell issue's. I.e. application 1 using 2.6.2 in
> wxcore26.dll and applcation 2 using 2.6.4 in wxcore26.dll...
> Jan

the dll issue can be solved easily with the VENDOR string, which can be defined
when building the wxWidgets library as dll,

use VENDOR=wx263 when building

e.g.
smake -f makefile.dms BUILD=release SHARED=1 MONOLITHIC=1 USE_XRC=1 UNICODE=1
VENDOR=wx263

and you get a

wxmsw26u_dmc_wx263.dll

then you're out of dll-hell ;-)
tiwag

tiwag wrote:
> == Quote from Jan Knepper (jan@smartsoft.us)'s article
>> DLL's are nice, but I suspect more than MFC wxWidgets's DLL's might
>> suffer from DLL hell issue's. I.e. application 1 using 2.6.2 in
>> wxcore26.dll and applcation 2 using 2.6.4 in wxcore26.dll...
>> Jan
> 
> the dll issue can be solved easily with the VENDOR string, which can be defined
> when building the wxWidgets library as dll,
> 
> use VENDOR=wx263 when building
> 
> e.g.
> smake -f makefile.dms BUILD=release SHARED=1 MONOLITHIC=1 USE_XRC=1 UNICODE=1
> VENDOR=wx263
> 
> and you get a
> 
> wxmsw26u_dmc_wx263.dll
> 
> then you're out of dll-hell ;-)
> tiwag

And version hell started...

Jan



-- 
ManiaC++
Jan Knepper

But as for me and my household, we shall use Mozilla...
www.mozilla.org