March 20, 2006 Re: DMD 0.150 release | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to John Demme | John Demme wrote:
> I ran some tests earlier today, and I love it! This is great!
>
> Thanks, Walter
>
> ~John Demme
>
Excellent! I'm really glad this was fixed!
-JJR
|
March 20, 2006 Re: DMD 0.150 release | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to John Demme | "John Demme" <me@teqdruid.com> wrote in message news:dvld5s$1e7c$1@digitaldaemon.com... >I ran some tests earlier today, and I love it! This is great! > > Thanks, Walter You're welcome! I'm glad it's working. I thought it would be much harder to implement than it turned out to be. |
March 20, 2006 Re: DMD 0.150 release | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Walter Bright | Walter Bright wrote:
> "John Demme" <me@teqdruid.com> wrote in message news:dvld5s$1e7c$1@digitaldaemon.com...
>> I ran some tests earlier today, and I love it! This is great!
>>
>> Thanks, Walter
>
> You're welcome! I'm glad it's working. I thought it would be much harder to implement than it turned out to be.
>
>
That's the mark of a good design ;)
Ant
|
March 20, 2006 Re: DMD 0.150 release | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Walter Bright | Nice work! (there's a small typo in the changelog: converstion) L. |
March 20, 2006 Re: DMD 0.150 release | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Ant | In article <dvlhg4$1koq$1@digitaldaemon.com>, Ant says... > >Walter Bright wrote: >> "John Demme" <me@teqdruid.com> wrote in message news:dvld5s$1e7c$1@digitaldaemon.com... >>> I ran some tests earlier today, and I love it! This is great! >>> >>> Thanks, Walter >> >> You're welcome! I'm glad it's working. I thought it would be much harder to implement than it turned out to be. >> >> > >That's the mark of a good design ;) > >Ant I agree - I recall seeing Walter making similiar remarks about implementing other features of D. Pretty cool. |
March 20, 2006 Re: DMD 0.150 release | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Walter Bright | In article <dvj3fi$2jb0$1@digitaldaemon.com>, Walter Bright says... > >I wanted to get the interface covariant problem fixed for the library guys. > >http://www.digitalmars.com/d/changelog.html Pardon my ignorance, but what is (was) "the interface covariant problem"? Nick |
March 20, 2006 Re: DMD 0.150 release | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Nick | "Nick" <Nick_member@pathlink.com> wrote in message news:dvmuuu$kjm$1@digitaldaemon.com... > In article <dvj3fi$2jb0$1@digitaldaemon.com>, Walter Bright says... >>I wanted to get the interface covariant problem fixed for the library guys. > Pardon my ignorance, but what is (was) "the interface covariant problem"? See the "interfaces :-(" thread over in digitalmars.D.dtl |
March 21, 2006 Re: DMD 0.150 release | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Walter Bright | Walter Bright wrote:
> I wanted to get the interface covariant problem fixed for the library guys.
>
> http://www.digitalmars.com/d/changelog.html
>
>
>
:)
|
March 21, 2006 Re: DMD 0.150 release | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Walter Bright | Walter Bright wrote:
> I wanted to get the interface covariant problem fixed for the library guys.
>
> http://www.digitalmars.com/d/changelog.html
Out of curiosity - how did you implement it?
xs0
|
March 21, 2006 Re: DMD 0.150 release | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to xs0 | "xs0" <xs0@xs0.com> wrote in message news:dvpgtm$ua2$1@digitaldaemon.com... > Walter Bright wrote: >> I wanted to get the interface covariant problem fixed for the library guys. >> >> http://www.digitalmars.com/d/changelog.html > > Out of curiosity - how did you implement it? The type returned by a virtual function is the type of its introducing function. After the function returns, it is cast to the derived return type. |
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation