Adds partial symbolic debug info support for Linux.

(Doesn't look like much, but it's a lot of code to support this!)

Doesn't yet do the internals of structs or classes.

http://www.digitalmars.com/d/changelog.html

"Walter Bright" <newshound@digitalmars.com> wrote in message news:e3tefc$1n5d$1@digitaldaemon.com...
> Adds partial symbolic debug info support for Linux.
>
> (Doesn't look like much, but it's a lot of code to support this!)
>
> Doesn't yet do the internals of structs or classes.
>
Nice!  I appreciate what you've done so far Walter, and can't wait to see it completed.
> http://www.digitalmars.com/d/changelog.html

In article <e3tefc$1n5d$1@digitaldaemon.com>, Walter Bright says...
>
>Adds partial symbolic debug info support for Linux.
>
>(Doesn't look like much, but it's a lot of code to support this!)
>
>Doesn't yet do the internals of structs or classes.
>
>http://www.digitalmars.com/d/changelog.html

Nice!  This will make my development trips into LinuxLand a lot easier. Thanks!

- EricAnderton at yahoo

Walter Bright schrieb:
> Adds partial symbolic debug info support for Linux.
> 
> (Doesn't look like much, but it's a lot of code to support this!)
> 
> Doesn't yet do the internals of structs or classes.
> 
> http://www.digitalmars.com/d/changelog.html

Great.
Does this allready work with gdb? Or is additional work necessary for
the gdb-patches?

Frank Benoit wrote:
> Great.
> Does this allready work with gdb? Or is additional work necessary for
> the gdb-patches?

Yes, it works already with gdb, though it works better with the D patched one.

Walter Bright schrieb am 2006-05-10:
> Adds partial symbolic debug info support for Linux.

While you are at it:
How about adding line number debug info for inline assembler code?

Thomas

Thomas Kuehne wrote:

> Walter Bright schrieb am 2006-05-10:
>> Adds partial symbolic debug info support for Linux.
> 
> While you are at it:
> How about adding line number debug info for inline assembler code?

I'll add it to the queue!

Awesome! Thank you!

What happened to 0.156?

Stewart.

-- 
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.1
GCS/M d- s:-@ C++@ a->--- UB@ P+ L E@ W++@ N+++ o K-@ w++@ O? M V? PS- PE- Y? PGP- t- 5? X? R b DI? D G e++++ h-- r-- !y
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------

My e-mail is valid but not my primary mailbox.  Please keep replies on the 'group where everyone may benefit.

Stewart Gordon wrote:

> What happened to 0.156?

http://www.digitalmars.com/d/changelog.html#new0156

It fixed some printf's, that W had missed to comment.

--anders