December 17
Usually length is given for dynamic arrays that wastes visual space. The type of given. For static arrays it looks like int[34] while for dynamic arrays it is int[] and the length=34 is added. Why not just put the length in like static arrays? It's much more concise and gives more room for important information.

data	{length=20} [, -10, -9, -8, -7, -6, -5, -4, -3, -2, -1, 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9]	int[]

can just become

data	[, -10, -9, -8, -7, -6, -5, -4, -3, -2, -1, 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9]	int[20]

If you want to make it look different from static then write it as

int[_20_] or int[=20=] or int[`20`] or ....


it saves at least 11 characters that can be used to show more elements and doesn't clutter up the values list with a lot of lengths.


11 hours ago

On 17/12/2019 08:40, AlphaPurned wrote:
> Usually length is given for dynamic arrays that wastes visual space. The type of given. For static arrays it looks like int[34] while for dynamic arrays it is int[] and the length=34 is added. Why not just put the length in like static arrays? It's much more concise and gives more room for important information.
> 
> data    {length=20} [, -10, -9, -8, -7, -6, -5, -4, -3, -2, -1, 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9]    int[]
> 
> can just become
> 
> data    [, -10, -9, -8, -7, -6, -5, -4, -3, -2, -1, 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9]    int[20]
> 
> If you want to make it look different from static then write it as
> 
> int[_20_] or int[=20=] or int[`20`] or ....
> 
> 
> it saves at least 11 characters that can be used to show more elements and doesn't clutter up the values list with a lot of lengths.
> 

I have added an option to move the {length=nn} display into the type field.