February 16, 2007Re: DMD 1.005 release
Posted in reply to Don Clugston
Don Clugston wrote: > Isn't it always going to be true that the scope where stringof is applied, could be different from where it is mixed in? Yes. > That's why I figured that the concept of symbolnameof (the minimal descriptor in the scope) was different from qualifiednameof (valid in any scope). Of course, you've got access to much more information than I did, so perhaps there's a cleaner solution. It obviously needs more work <g>.
Copyright © 1999-2017 by the D Language Foundation