View mode: basic / threaded / horizontal-split · Log in · Help
February 10, 2007
Re: Reviewing Phobos
Tomas Lindquist Olsen wrote:
> Sean Kelly wrote:
> 
>> One of the original
>> goals of Ares, and transitively for Tango, was to define a strict and
>> logical separation between the core components of a D application: the
>> compiler runtime code, the garbage collector, and the standard library
>> itself.
> 
> It would be really nice if phobos and Tango could share the lowest levels.
> Compiler runtime code and garbage collector.

I agree :-)


Sean
February 11, 2007
Re: Reviewing Phobos
Sean Kelly Wrote:

> Tomas Lindquist Olsen wrote:
> > Sean Kelly wrote:
> > 
> >> One of the original
> >> goals of Ares, and transitively for Tango, was to define a strict and
> >> logical separation between the core components of a D application: the
> >> compiler runtime code, the garbage collector, and the standard library
> >> itself.
> > 
> > It would be really nice if phobos and Tango could share the lowest levels.
> > Compiler runtime code and garbage collector.
> 
> I agree :-)
> 
> 
> Sean


Me too, and thanks for the great response explaining things a couple posts back.
I had naively assumed that the core runtime code was external to phobos but if I had not thought it through.
February 13, 2007
Re: Reviewing Phobos
Tomas Lindquist Olsen wrote:
> Sean Kelly wrote:
> 
>> One of the original
>> goals of Ares, and transitively for Tango, was to define a strict and
>> logical separation between the core components of a D application: the
>> compiler runtime code, the garbage collector, and the standard library
>> itself.
> 
> It would be really nice if phobos and Tango could share the lowest levels.
> Compiler runtime code and garbage collector.
> 

Yes, I hope this will happen, too....

L.
Next ›   Last »
1 2
Top | Discussion index | About this forum | D home