On Monday, 10 November 2014 at 16:44:53 UTC, Andre wrote:
> Is there any possibility to access private members by using Template Mixins?

Yes, like this:
https://github.com/nomad-software/tkd/blob/master/source/tkd/widget/common/value.d

On Mon, 10 Nov 2014 18:09:12 -0000, deadalnix <deadalnix@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Monday, 10 November 2014 at 10:21:34 UTC, Regan Heath wrote:
>> On Fri, 31 Oct 2014 09:30:25 -0000, Dejan Lekic <dejan.lekic@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> In D apps I work on I prefer all my classes in a single module, as is common "D way", or shall I call it "modular way"?
>>
>> Sure, but that's not the point of partial.  It's almost never used by the programmer directly, and when it is used you almost never need to look at the generated partial class code as "it just works".  So, you effectively get what you "prefer" but you also get clean separation between generated and user code, which is very important if the generated code needs to be re-generated and it also means the user code stays simpler, cleaner and easier to work with.
>>
>> Basically it's just a good idea(TM).  Unfortunately as many have said, it's not something D2.0 is likely to see.  String mixins aren't the nicest thing to use, but at least they can achieve the same/similar thing.
>>
>> R
>
> I don't get how the same can't be achieved with mixin template
> for instance.

Someone raised concerns.. I haven't looked into it myself.  If it can, great :)

R

-- 
Using Opera's revolutionary email client: http://www.opera.com/mail/