October 15, 2017
On Saturday, 14 October 2017 at 14:49:27 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> Yes, we're up for that. We need a strong folow-up here (in the form of a formal proposal) from Benjamin and others interested. -- Andrei

I myself might try to resurrect the issue (probably in the forum), as a better DLL support under Windows would help D to move forward. Windows is the most used platform, and a better DLL support would open the door for a lot of opportunities (easier use of D for low-level scripting, interfacing with other software, etc.). D has the power to replace C++, but only if it takes the right directions.
March 21
On Saturday, 30 September 2017 at 16:10:44 UTC, Jonathan Marler wrote:
> https://wiki.dlang.org/DIP88
>
> I'd like to see DIP88 (Named Parameters) revived.  Was this proposal rejected or is it just stale and needs a refresh?  Named parameters can be implemented in a library, however, in my opinion they are useful enough to warrant a clean syntax with language support.  I'd be willing to refresh the DIP so long as I know the idea has not already been rejected.

Has anything changed in 2019?

@Jonathan are you still interested to revive it?
March 21
On Thursday, 21 March 2019 at 07:20:09 UTC, sighoya wrote:
> On Saturday, 30 September 2017 at 16:10:44 UTC, Jonathan Marler wrote:
>> https://wiki.dlang.org/DIP88
>>
>> I'd like to see DIP88 (Named Parameters) revived.  Was this proposal rejected or is it just stale and needs a refresh?  Named parameters can be implemented in a library, however, in my opinion they are useful enough to warrant a clean syntax with language support.  I'd be willing to refresh the DIP so long as I know the idea has not already been rejected.
>
> Has anything changed in 2019?
>
> @Jonathan are you still interested to revive it?

Yeah, just waiting to see if they fix the DIP process.

Next ›   Last »
1 2