It would be nice if Bright could select an official logotype that could be used for promoting purposes. I found alot of nice logos at: http://www.sukimashita.com/d/
http://www.prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?Logo

DavidSwe wrote

> Bright could select an official logotype

Walter has made that selection long ago:
by kindly asking what might be wrong with his D-Man.

-manfred

I think most of us have a soft spot for the D-man, the improved D-man at http://www.prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?Logo gets my vote.

Charlie

DavidSwe wrote:
> It would be nice if Bright could select an official logotype that could be used for promoting purposes. I found alot of nice logos at: http://www.sukimashita.com/d/
> http://www.prowiki.org/wiki4d/wiki.cgi?Logo
> 

I posted these a while back.  Not quite as good as the original however they still have that programmer art flavor.  They are free to use.

http://www.joelsprojects.com/d/MrD/DMan.html

-Joel

janderson wrote:
> I posted these a while back.  Not quite as good as the original however they still have that programmer art flavor.  They are free to use.
> 
> http://www.joelsprojects.com/d/MrD/DMan.html
> 
> -Joel

whoops, try this:

http://www.joelsprojects.com/d/DMan.htm

Im just saying that I think D deserves a more professional looking logo. The D-Man and the new logo can peacefully coexist. So those who have a "soft-spot for the D-Man" can use it and those who dont like it can use something else. It would be nice if Bright decided one for us that want to support D but don't want a hand drawn character on their homepage. Having to many logos will also be a bother because that will just start confusion, especially since there have been other languages that have called themselves D if my memory serves.

Manfred Nowak Wrote:

> DavidSwe wrote
> 
> > Bright could select an official logotype
> 
> Walter has made that selection long ago:
> by kindly asking what might be wrong with his D-Man.
> 
> -manfred
> 

if there is really a need for another logo, i'd suggest holding a
logo-design-competition, like linus torvalds did once to find tux.
and btw - tux probably doesn't satisfy the attribute "professional
looking" either, at least if it's in that "corporate style, will be
taken seriously by suit-wearing folks"-meaning.
personally, i added a logo to the ddbg page only to get rid of all those
404's on favicon.ico ;)

DavidSwe wrote:
> Im just saying that I think D deserves a more professional looking logo. The D-Man and the new logo can peacefully coexist. So those who have a "soft-spot for the D-Man" can use it and those who dont like it can use something else. It would be nice if Bright decided one for us that want to support D but don't want a hand drawn character on their homepage. Having to many logos will also be a bother because that will just start confusion, especially since there have been other languages that have called themselves D if my memory serves.
> 
> Manfred Nowak Wrote:
> 
>> DavidSwe wrote
>>
>>> Bright could select an official logotype
>> Walter has made that selection long ago:
>> by kindly asking what might be wrong with his D-Man.
>>
>> -manfred
>>
> 

DavidSwe wrote:

> It would be nice if Bright could select an official logotype that could be used for promoting purposes. I found alot of nice logos at:

> http://www.sukimashita.com/d/

I'll definitely go for the first of the variant 4(=D).

Wolfgang Draxinger
-- 
E-Mail address works, Jabber: hexarith@jabber.org, ICQ: 134682867