May 13, 2007
>   - Versioned specification, so D can be a language specification rather a
>     compiler implementation (this will help compiler developers).


I wonder if we should start a thread dedicated to such "lateral" changes 
 that people would like for the 2.0 fork? Any thoughts on this?

To be honest, these are the changes that excite me most; they let me believe that just because some aspect of the current state of D is less than ideal, it doesn't have to stay this way.
Next ›   Last »
1 2 3 4 5