May 30, 2007Re: Reference to an object disregarding mutation - what's the trick?
Posted in reply to Manfred Nowak
Reply to Manfred, > Steve Teale wrote > >> OK, here's the full story. >> > What clumsy data structure might be organized by that? > > That seems to be > arr= arr[ 0 .. findex] ~ newnode ~ arr[ findex .. arr.length]; > and nothing more. > -manfred > yes that is what it seems to be, however, it skips the guarantied reallocation of the cat version