Jump to page: 1 2 3
Thread overview
DMD 1.018 and 2.002 releases
Jul 01, 2007
Walter Bright
Jul 01, 2007
Christian Kamm
Jul 01, 2007
Frits van Bommel
Jul 02, 2007
Luís Marques
Jul 03, 2007
Walter Bright
Jul 03, 2007
BCS
Jul 03, 2007
Brad Anderson
Jul 03, 2007
Serg Kovrov
Jul 05, 2007
0ffh
Jul 03, 2007
Clay Smith
Jul 01, 2007
Vladimir Panteleev
Jul 01, 2007
Walter Bright
Jul 01, 2007
Oskar Linde
Jul 01, 2007
janderson
Jul 01, 2007
Vladimir Panteleev
Jul 01, 2007
Walter Bright
Jul 01, 2007
David Ferenczi
Jul 01, 2007
Marsell
Jul 01, 2007
Sean Kelly
Jul 02, 2007
Walter Bright
Jul 02, 2007
Lars Ivar Igesund
Jul 02, 2007
Clay Smith
Jul 02, 2007
Don Clugston
Jul 02, 2007
Manuel König
Jul 03, 2007
Pragma
Jul 08, 2007
Walter Bright
Jul 04, 2007
Frits van Bommel
Jul 04, 2007
Walter Bright
July 01, 2007
Just bug fixes common to both.

http://www.digitalmars.com/d/1.0/changelog.html
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.1.018.zip

http://www.digitalmars.com/d/changelog.html
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd.2.002.zip
July 01, 2007
> Just bug fixes common to both.

Great news! And special thanks for fixing bug 540...

Unfortunately, this code (which appears in derelict) broke

-
version(Windows)
  extern(Windows):
else
  extern(C):

Declaration expected, not 'else'
-

Looking around in the spec, I can not find where the StorageClass: syntax is defined, so maybe it is supposed to be illegal?

Cheers,
Christian
July 01, 2007
On Sun, 01 Jul 2007 21:24:22 +0300, Walter Bright <newshound1@digitalmars.com> wrote:

> Just bug fixes common to both.

Awesome! Thank you for taking the time to go back and fix all those issues! :D

-- 
Best regards,
  Vladimir                          mailto:thecybershadow@gmail.com
July 01, 2007
Christian Kamm wrote:
>> Just bug fixes common to both.
> 
> Great news! And special thanks for fixing bug 540...
> 
> Unfortunately, this code (which appears in derelict) broke
> 
> -
> version(Windows)
>   extern(Windows):
> else
>   extern(C):
> 
> Declaration expected, not 'else'
> -

Workaround:
---
version(Windows) {
  extern(Windows):
} else {
  extern(C):
}
---

> Looking around in the spec, I can not find where the StorageClass: syntax is
> defined, [snip]

http://www.digitalmars.com/d/attribute.html
July 01, 2007
Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
> Awesome! Thank you for taking the time to go back and fix all those issues! :D

The only problem is, I don't seem to have even made a dent in them!
July 01, 2007
Walter Bright skrev:
> Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
>> Awesome! Thank you for taking the time to go back and fix all those issues! :D
> 
> The only problem is, I don't seem to have even made a dent in them!

The number of resolved bugs is nevertheless impressive:

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/reports.cgi?product=-All-&datasets=NEW%3A&datasets=REOPENED%3A&datasets=RESOLVED%3A

/Oskar
July 01, 2007
On Sun, 01 Jul 2007 21:24:22 +0300, Walter Bright <newshound1@digitalmars.com> wrote:

> Renamed linux library from libphobos.a to libphobos2.a

It seems like D 2.001's libphobos.a got packaged instead of the new libphobos2.a by accident :)

-- 
Best regards,
  Vladimir                          mailto:thecybershadow@gmail.com
July 01, 2007
Thank you very much for the last two bugfix releases!
Once you got in going don't stop! ;-)

Thanks again,
David



July 01, 2007
Oskar Linde wrote:
> Walter Bright skrev:
>> Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
>>> Awesome! Thank you for taking the time to go back and fix all those issues! :D
>>
>> The only problem is, I don't seem to have even made a dent in them!
> 
> The number of resolved bugs is nevertheless impressive:
> 
> http://d.puremagic.com/issues/reports.cgi?product=-All-&datasets=NEW%3A&datasets=REOPENED%3A&datasets=RESOLVED%3A 
> 
> 
> /Oskar

Looking at that chart there does seem to be a significant dent :)
July 01, 2007
> Just bug fixes common to both.

This makes me very happy, particularly since I'm contemplating using 1.0 for a small albeit longer-term project. So thank you.

May I suggest automating or eliminating the "Download latest stable (1.016)" blurb in the ChangeLog? It would seem to me that all future versions of 1.0 are meant to be stable.
« First   ‹ Prev
1 2 3