Derek Parnell Wrote:

> On Fri, 28 Dec 2007 10:35:38 -0800, Walter Bright wrote:
> 
> > Sean Kelly wrote:
> >> The weird thing for me is that this will allow individual enums of any type but grouped enums of only numeric types.
> > 
> > The following will work:
> > 
> > enum
> > {
> >      x = 3,   // x is int
> >      y = 4L,  // y is long
> > }
> > 
> > The idea is that for anonymous enums, there is no type for the enumeration as a whole. Therefore, each member of the enumeration can have a different type.
> 
> Will your syntax allow declarations of single values? e.g.
> 
>   enum x = 3;
>   enum y = 4L;
> 
> Or will we have to use the {} form?
> 
>    enum {x = 3}
>    enum {y = 4L}
> 
> -- 
> Derek Parnell
> Melbourne, Australia
> skype: derek.j.parnell

You'll be able to do

>   enum x = 3;
>   enum y = 4L;

It's here somewhere in this thread already.