Ary Borenszweig wrote:

> Jason House escribió:
>> Bruno Medeiros wrote:
>> 
>>> Jason House wrote:
>>>> Bruno Medeiros wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I use Mmrnmhrm. But I want to check out Descent 0.5 (which I haven't already because I've been busy), which introduces many of the features Mmrnmhrm has (specially code completion), and others more, which could make it preferable.
>>>>>
>>>> I use emacs with d-mode.  I haven't tried Mmrnmhrm, but did try
>>>> Descent. My project was large enough to uncover bugs out of the box
>>>> (recommended
>>>> solution: disable features).  Reading the docs, I saw all features I
>>>> was
>>>> interested in (including code completion) had disclaimers about bugs.
>>>> I set it down to wait for the next release.
>>> What kind of bugs? Soft bugs like incorrect or missing matches, or harder bugs like IDE/editor crashes, OutOfMemory, error messages, etc?
>>>
>>> I tried Descent recently, but only on small code samples. I didn't try it in any large project, so I don't know how well it would stand up. For what I've seen, Descent code completion is now much more accurate than Mmrnmhrm's, but the overall IDE seems more unstable than before.
>>>
>> 
>> It's been quite a while, so I don't really remember.  I definitely hit
>> bugs
>> with syntax highlighting, and marking code with compilation errors.  I
>> had
>> a manageable bug with automatic code compilation.  That last one was also
>> fixed rather quickly, but the other two reduced Descent to being about as
>> helpful as any other text editor :(
> 
> That already changed in trunk. Really, I applied the new approach I described in some other post, and evertyhing started working much accurately, smoothly, and without bugs (well, I also wrote a lot of unit tests which were missing before). It is much, much more stable now. We hope to release soon. :-)

Cool!  I look forward to the release.

Lars Ivar Igesund wrote:
> BCS wrote:
> 
>> I uses a text editor (edit++) and the command prompt.
> 
> Usually Vim, sometimes Eclipse (but the lack of a true vim plugin usually
> ruins it for me).
> 

Do you use any extensions? Can you advice something?

Leonid S. Krashenko wrote:

> Lars Ivar Igesund wrote:
>> BCS wrote:
>> 
>>> I uses a text editor (edit++) and the command prompt.
>> 
>> Usually Vim, sometimes Eclipse (but the lack of a true vim plugin usually
>> ruins it for me).
>> 
> 
> Do you use any extensions? Can you advice something?

For vim? No, I don't use any particular extensions, although I know people like various tabs, and file listing / session management type of plugins.

-- 
Lars Ivar Igesund
blog at http://larsivi.net
DSource, #d.tango & #D: larsivi
Dancing the Tango

BCS wrote:
> I uses a text editor (edit++) and the command prompt.

Windows:
Entice Designer + Batch scripts. My job entails writing a lot of
Window/Form based applications, and I use DFL for this anyways. So Entice is kind of an obvious choice with the form designer / built-in DFL support.

Linux/FreeBSD:
gedit/kWrite/Kate/nano + Shell scripts. I am not picky when it comes to text editors. As long as there is syntax highlighting and I can edit the tabs I am happy. If only a terminal is available I generally use nano.

I use PSPad (for Windows).  It has an option for D syntax highlighting and can be set it up  to issue compile commands and capture the console responses.  It wasn't obvious where to find the compiler command settings: they're on the Compiler tab under Settings \ Highlighter Settings.

"BCS" <BCS@pathlink.com> wrote in message news:fofvuh$2a4i$2@digitalmars.com...
>I uses a text editor (edit++) and the command prompt.