April 25, 2008Re: Status D dynamic libs?
Posted in reply to Bruno Medeiros
Bruno Medeiros schrieb: > Yup. Due to the nature of DLL's, D-to-D shared libraries are never going > to work right (unless one restricts the API to C-level constructs only, > ie, no classes, no exceptions, etc.). > That's why a project such as DDL is so important, and it's a shame that > Walter does not realize how beneficial such technology would be for D. > Anyone who has used libraries with Java or C# (or interpreted high-level > languages) knows how comfortable it is not having to worry about any of > such issues, and still have the full power of the language available > across libraries. > yes. And even if .so on linux can do most of the stuff DDL does, it would be good to have a toolchain that works on all plattforms in the same way. That would also mean that the binary format is defined in the D language spec.