Thread overview | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
April 24, 2008 Agg in D? | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Has anyone considered porting Agg (http://www.antigrain.com/) to D? There is a Pascal http://aggpas.org/ and C# port http://agg-sharp.sourceforge.net/ It would be a good Graphic api library for D. Cheers, N/A |
April 24, 2008 Re: Agg in D? | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to N/A | N/A wrote:
> Has anyone considered porting Agg (http://www.antigrain.com/) to D?
> There is a Pascal http://aggpas.org/
> and C# port http://agg-sharp.sourceforge.net/
>
> It would be a good Graphic api library for D.
I've thought about briefly, but that's about it.
I used the C++ version and thought it was pretty cool, but after that I pretty much don't want to ever have to use that API again. So if I were to port it, I'd probably port Agg2D as well, which puts a reasonable API on top of AGG.
I'm also not wild about the change in licence, which serves to zap my motivation. I'd be more interested in a 2.4 than a 2.5 port.
--bb
|
April 24, 2008 Re: Agg in D? | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to N/A | N/A wrote:
> Has anyone considered porting Agg (http://www.antigrain.com/) to D?
> There is a Pascal http://aggpas.org/
> and C# port http://agg-sharp.sourceforge.net/
>
> It would be a good Graphic api library for D.
>
> Cheers,
> N/A
I've always thought it'd make a fun and educational (for me) project to port this api, maybe I'm going to do it someday. There is also a graphics api scheduled for tango btw.
|
April 24, 2008 Re: Agg in D? | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Bill Baxter | On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 14:13:15 +0400, Bill Baxter <dnewsgroup@billbaxter.com> wrote:
> N/A wrote:
>> Has anyone considered porting Agg (http://www.antigrain.com/) to D?
>> There is a Pascal http://aggpas.org/
>> and C# port http://agg-sharp.sourceforge.net/
>> It would be a good Graphic api library for D.
>
> I've thought about briefly, but that's about it.
> I used the C++ version and thought it was pretty cool, but after that I pretty much don't want to ever have to use that API again. So if I were to port it, I'd probably port Agg2D as well, which puts a reasonable API on top of AGG.
>
> I'm also not wild about the change in licence, which serves to zap my motivation. I'd be more interested in a 2.4 than a 2.5 port.
>
> --bb
Commercial licensing is also available upon request.
|
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation