Thread overview
Agg in D?
Apr 24, 2008
N/A
Apr 24, 2008
Bill Baxter
Apr 24, 2008
Koroskin Denis
Apr 24, 2008
Lutger
April 24, 2008
Has anyone considered porting Agg (http://www.antigrain.com/) to D?
There is a Pascal http://aggpas.org/
and C# port http://agg-sharp.sourceforge.net/

It would be a good Graphic api library for D.

Cheers,
N/A

April 24, 2008
N/A wrote:
> Has anyone considered porting Agg (http://www.antigrain.com/) to D?
> There is a Pascal http://aggpas.org/
> and C# port http://agg-sharp.sourceforge.net/
> 
> It would be a good Graphic api library for D.

I've thought about briefly, but that's about it.
I used the C++ version and thought it was pretty cool, but after that I pretty much don't want to ever have to use that API again.   So if I were to port it, I'd probably port Agg2D as well, which puts a reasonable API on top of AGG.

I'm also not wild about the change in licence, which serves to zap my motivation.  I'd be more interested in a 2.4 than a 2.5 port.

--bb
April 24, 2008
N/A wrote:

> Has anyone considered porting Agg (http://www.antigrain.com/) to D?
> There is a Pascal http://aggpas.org/
> and C# port http://agg-sharp.sourceforge.net/
> 
> It would be a good Graphic api library for D.
> 
> Cheers,
> N/A

I've always thought it'd make a fun and educational (for me) project to port this api, maybe I'm going to do it someday. There is also a graphics api scheduled for tango btw.
April 24, 2008
On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 14:13:15 +0400, Bill Baxter <dnewsgroup@billbaxter.com> wrote:

> N/A wrote:
>> Has anyone considered porting Agg (http://www.antigrain.com/) to D?
>> There is a Pascal http://aggpas.org/
>> and C# port http://agg-sharp.sourceforge.net/
>>  It would be a good Graphic api library for D.
>
> I've thought about briefly, but that's about it.
> I used the C++ version and thought it was pretty cool, but after that I pretty much don't want to ever have to use that API again.   So if I were to port it, I'd probably port Agg2D as well, which puts a reasonable API on top of AGG.
>
> I'm also not wild about the change in licence, which serves to zap my motivation.  I'd be more interested in a 2.4 than a 2.5 port.
>
> --bb

Commercial licensing is also available upon request.