View mode: basic / threaded / horizontal-split · Log in · Help
December 26, 2008
Re: dmd platform support - poll
== Quote from Walter Bright (newshound1@digitalmars.com)'s article
> What platforms for dmd would you be most interested in using?
> .net
> jvm
> mac osx 32 bit intel
> mac osx 64 bit intel
> linux 64 bit
> windows 64 bit
> freebsd 32 bit
> netbsd 32 bit
> other?

Windows or Linux 64-bit, whichever is easier to implement/useful to more people.
I'm just sometimes aggravated by the obsolete 32-bit address space limit when
working with large amounts of data on machines that have plenty of memory if only
I could address it.
December 26, 2008
Re: dmd platform support - poll
"Walter Bright" <newshound1@digitalmars.com> wrote in message 
news:gj0qht$2lc1$1@digitalmars.com...
> What platforms for dmd would you be most interested in using?
>
> .net
> jvm
> mac osx 32 bit intel
> mac osx 64 bit intel
> linux 64 bit
> windows 64 bit
> freebsd 32 bit
> netbsd 32 bit
>
> other?

Windows 64 Bits
Linux 64 Bits
December 26, 2008
Re: dmd platform support - poll
1. linux 32bit & linux 64bit
2. windows 32 bit & windows 64bit

I'm using dmd to develop real project in linux 32bit.

Walter Bright Wrote:

> What platforms for dmd would you be most interested in using?
> 
> .net
> jvm
> mac osx 32 bit intel
> mac osx 64 bit intel
> linux 64 bit
> windows 64 bit
> freebsd 32 bit
> netbsd 32 bit
> 
> other?
December 26, 2008
Re: dmd platform support - poll
Walter Bright wrote:
> What platforms for dmd would you be most interested in using?


In order of preference:

Mac OSX 32 bit
Windows 64 bit
Mac OSX 64 bit
December 26, 2008
Re: dmd platform support - poll
Robert Jacques wrote:
> 
> I'm perfectly happy with 32 windows & linux, but have some minor 
> interest in:
> Solaris x86

Oh good point.  SPARC Solaris would be nice as well.  Though that's only 
if I plan to use D at work.


Sean
December 26, 2008
Re: dmd platform support - poll
Walter Bright wrote:
> What platforms for dmd would you be most interested in using?
> 
> .net
> jvm
> mac osx 32 bit intel
> mac osx 64 bit intel
> linux 64 bit
> windows 64 bit
> freebsd 32 bit
> netbsd 32 bit
> 
> other?

64bit - both windows and linux.

Nick B
December 26, 2008
Re: dmd platform support - poll
Walter Bright wrote:
> What platforms for dmd would you be most interested in using?
> 
> .net
> jvm
> mac osx 32 bit intel
> mac osx 64 bit intel
> linux 64 bit
> windows 64 bit
> freebsd 32 bit
> netbsd 32 bit
> 
> other?

Linux 64

Andrei
December 26, 2008
Re: dmd platform support - poll
On Thu, 25 Dec 2008 12:30:52 -0800, Walter Bright wrote:

> What platforms for dmd would you be most interested in using?
> 
> .net
> jvm
> mac osx 32 bit intel
> mac osx 64 bit intel
> linux 64 bit
> windows 64 bit
> freebsd 32 bit
> netbsd 32 bit
> 
> other?

Amiga  (I can dream can't I?)
Windows 64
Linux 64

-- 
Derek Parnell
Melbourne, Australia
skype: derek.j.parnell
December 26, 2008
Re: dmd platform support - poll
Walter Bright wrote:
> What platforms for dmd would you be most interested in using?

32 & 64bit OS X
64bit Linux
December 26, 2008
Re: dmd platform support - poll
Reply to Sean,

> Robert Jacques wrote:
> 
>> I'm perfectly happy with 32 windows & linux, but have some minor
>> interest in:
>> Solaris x86
> Oh good point.  SPARC Solaris would be nice as well.  Though that's
> only if I plan to use D at work.
> 
> Sean
> 

Ditto, because it would be nice to be able to bootstrap without cross compiling 
at the same time. ("When I get time" I'm planning on finishing a D compiler 
and plan on targeting sparc first)
1 2 3 4 5 6
Top | Discussion index | About this forum | D home