On Tuesday, 7 July 2015 at 06:10:33 UTC, Mathias Lang wrote:
> Congrats !
> Though, I don't know if you'd notice, but those binary are not using from
> Travis-ci:
> https://github.com/rejectedsoftware/vibe.d/pull/1171#issuecomment-119005076
> Which makes it sensitively harder to test it (and I'd like to thank Martin
> Nowak again for making it so easy to test compilers - testing a beta
> compiler is now one additional line to .travis.yml, commit, push).

I am aware of this problem. I missed the flag to statically link against libstdc++. :-( I create new Linux binaries to fix it.

Regards,
Kai

On Tuesday, 7 July 2015 at 06:10:33 UTC, Mathias Lang wrote:
> Congrats !
> Though, I don't know if you'd notice, but those binary are not using from
> Travis-ci:
> https://github.com/rejectedsoftware/vibe.d/pull/1171#issuecomment-119005076
> Which makes it sensitively harder to test it (and I'd like to thank Martin
> Nowak again for making it so easy to test compilers - testing a beta
> compiler is now one additional line to .travis.yml, commit, push).

I reported [1] yesterday. Most probably some tests in vibe.d will segfault (my simple http file server crashes upon the first request on linux-x86_64).
Great that vibe.d tests with beta versions. If someone can confirm [1], it will not hurt :)

[1] https://github.com/ldc-developers/ldc/issues/989