May 14
On Monday, 13 May 2019 at 23:48:08 UTC, Johan Coder wrote:
> On Monday, 13 May 2019 at 22:24:53 UTC, James Thompson wrote:
>> On Monday, 13 May 2019 at 21:43:36 UTC, Guillaume Piolat wrote:
>>> It seems one lesson to take from this is that anonimity in these forums should not be an option.
>>
>> It would be interesting to try this for a couple of weeks and see how the overall tone changes.
>>
>> If we're supposed to be following 'professional conduct' here it doesn't seem too strange to have our actions affect our professional reputations.
>
> I agree. If not even required I will post as myself if most other people do so.

I highly recommend not to post anonymously. I value the voice of people way more if they don’t hide behind a pseudonym. If you feel you need to be anonymous to protect your position at work then I pity you, as I wouldn’t be working at a place like that. I think everybody benefits when people post under their real name. Not the least the poster, as every valuable contribution to a discussion will add to her/his professional credibility.

Bastiaan.
May 14
On Monday, 13 May 2019 at 22:24:53 UTC, James Thompson wrote:
> If we're supposed to be following 'professional conduct' here it doesn't seem too strange to have our actions affect our professional reputations.

Ad hominem isn't and never was professional conduct and can't hope to be.
May 14
On Tuesday, 14 May 2019 at 01:50:31 UTC, Johan Coder wrote:
>
> Thank you, I will watch.  But in the AGM his content was not good (and of course I have nothing against imperfect speech, mine is definitely worse).

Please do point out which content you had problems with?

It should be noted that I had an agenda to push. And a general meeting a good opportunity to do so.

Which topics would you rather have heard?

If I had not spoken up would it have changed anything?


May 14
On Monday, 13 May 2019 at 21:03:37 UTC, Seb wrote:
> On Monday, 13 May 2019 at 18:04:07 UTC, Johan Coder wrote:
>>>> No discussion about the DIPS pipeline which is the most important!
>>>
>>> I'm pretty sure that was discussed.
>>
>> There is the video at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cpTAtiboIDs. Where?
>
> I highly recommend joining DConf next year yourself in person as the best part of DConf are the offline discussions.
>
> Anyhow, the change of the DIP process was partially announced here:
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cpTAtiboIDs&t=3015s
>
> (the upcoming change of leadership will affect the DIP process).

I was not sure at which point I should add my comment about the AGM video.
I would like to ask everybody, who has been in the room, to watch the video and please tell
me if my impression is wrong, that the AGM in total _seams_ to be a very poorly prepared event.

For me it was not an advertisement for Dlang.

But, being the first time held, it now gives a lot of room for improvement. :-)








Next ›   Last »
1 2 3