May 02, 2010 Re: // A great help for the best D, I think // | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Jesse Phillips | "Jesse Phillips" <jessekphillips+D@gmail.com> wrote in message news:hriama$1oui$1@digitalmars.com... > Rick Trelles wrote: > >> It has occurred to me that a rather simple setup would help a lot in those respects: If someone just sets up a new bulletin board and turns every item in www.digitalmars.com/d/2.0, or at least those in the language and library references, into topics, a huge beneficial activity would be unleashed: > > The problem is that many people only one to follow topics in one place, and currently the NG is that place. www.stackoverflow.com is a good place to ask questions about language features though. And as Walter points out, each page has a wiki. > > I think SO is a good place to ask such questions; it has tags, well known, and many D users follow it. But the NG is still the place to find most answers. > Any site that nags people about JS, forces OpenID and makes heavy use of AJAX is a crappy site, period. |
May 02, 2010 Re: // A great help for the best D, I think // | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Nick Sabalausky | Nick Sabalausky wrote:
> Any site that nags people about JS, forces OpenID and makes heavy use of AJAX is a crappy site, period.
I've tried to avoid having a site that was more than just plain html and style sheets. <g>
|
May 02, 2010 Re: // A great help for the best D, I think // | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Walter Bright | "Walter Bright" <newshound1@digitalmars.com> wrote in message news:hrioud$2h5g$1@digitalmars.com... > Nick Sabalausky wrote: >> Any site that nags people about JS, forces OpenID and makes heavy use of AJAX is a crappy site, period. > > I've tried to avoid having a site that was more than just plain html and style sheets. <g> I find that quite respectable (and rare) these days. I do find server-side scripting to be very helpful, though. But then, of course, that puts one right in my own personal hell of "Why isn't there a server-scripting language that doesn't suck *and* is guaranteed to be easily portable to any server?" Auto-generating HTML off-line is a nice way around that whenever it's possible (like for documentation). |
May 02, 2010 // See you there! // | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Walter Bright | On 5/1/2010 1:11 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
>
> It is a good idea, and at the top of every page there's a [Wiki] button
> which leads to a unique wiki page for each page.
OK, that wiki seems good for my proposal. I never paid attention to the buttons because I never thought they would direct to the spefic topic in the wiki.
See you there!
Rick
|
May 02, 2010 // See you there! // | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Walter Bright | (Sorry my news reader sent the response directly to Walter) > > It is a good idea, and at the top of every page there's a [Wiki] button > which leads to a unique wiki page for each page. OK, that wiki seems good for my proposal. I never paid attention to the buttons because I never thought they would direct to the specific topic in the wiki. See you there! Rick |
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation