View mode: basic / threaded / horizontal-split · Log in · Help
December 29, 2010
std.openrj
I've accidentally found this openrj.d module while reading phobos. The thing doesn't even compile, importing it fails. But it has no unittests so it's been dragged along in all recent DMD releases without anyone noticing.

Line 9 in openrj.d: Updated 10th March 2005
File modification date: September 03, 2009

I personally don't need it but I don't know if anyone else might need open-RJ support? Does this really belong in Phobos anyway?
December 29, 2010
Re: std.openrj
Andrej Mitrovic Wrote:

> I've accidentally found this openrj.d module while reading phobos. The thing doesn't even compile, importing it fails. But it has no unittests so it's been dragged along in all recent DMD releases without anyone noticing.
> 
> Line 9 in openrj.d: Updated 10th March 2005
> File modification date: September 03, 2009
> 
> I personally don't need it but I don't know if anyone else might need open-RJ support? Does this really belong in Phobos anyway?

It should have been removed ages ago.
December 29, 2010
Re: std.openrj
Sean Kelly Wrote:

> Andrej Mitrovic Wrote:
> 
> > I've accidentally found this openrj.d module while reading phobos. The thing doesn't even compile, importing it fails. But it has no unittests so it's been dragged along in all recent DMD releases without anyone noticing.
> > 
> > Line 9 in openrj.d: Updated 10th March 2005
> > File modification date: September 03, 2009
> > 
> > I personally don't need it but I don't know if anyone else might need open-RJ support? Does this really belong in Phobos anyway?
> 
> It should have been removed ages ago.

I'm getting rid of it now.
December 29, 2010
Re: std.openrj
(2010/12/29 12:55), Sean Kelly wrote:
> Sean Kelly Wrote:
> 
>> Andrej Mitrovic Wrote:
>>
>>> I've accidentally found this openrj.d module while reading phobos. The thing doesn't even compile, importing it fails. But it has no unittests so it's been dragged along in all recent DMD releases without anyone noticing.
>>>
>>> Line 9 in openrj.d: Updated 10th March 2005
>>> File modification date: September 03, 2009
>>>
>>> I personally don't need it but I don't know if anyone else might need open-RJ support? Does this really belong in Phobos anyway?
>>
>> It should have been removed ages ago.
> 
> I'm getting rid of it now.

Good job!
Similarly, std.bind is already unnecessary module, because D has closure.
I am waiting std.bind is removed, or an other useful bind module is added.
Top | Discussion index | About this forum | D home