Thread overview | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
August 06, 2020 Compiler switch: `-gdwarf-<version>` or `-gdwarf=<version>` ? | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Hello, Transcribing it here because not everyone may see it. From the PR https://github.com/dlang/dmd/pull/11509: wilzbach: >> Add `-gdwarf-<version>` compiler switch >Shouldn't the switch be -gdwarf=5 to be consistent with DMD's other flags? Then, it's also >possible for the user to list all available options. me: > Maybe, but Clang and GCC have the -gdwarf-<version> switch, so I added the same for consistency between different compilers. What do you think ? wilzbach: > I think sticking to the DMD style makes more sense here, because I am not sure a lot of people would like to have at least three more CLI flags. IIRC there has been a precedent with make flags. What do other people think? So, what's your point of view, guys ? |
August 07, 2020 Re: Compiler switch: `-gdwarf-<version>` or `-gdwarf=<version>` ? | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Luhrel | Stick to dmd style. If ldc or gdc wish to offer another style they may. |
August 06, 2020 Re: Compiler switch: `-gdwarf-<version>` or `-gdwarf=<version>` ? | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Luhrel | On Thursday, 6 August 2020 at 21:47:42 UTC, Luhrel wrote:
> So, what's your point of view, guys ?
I'd opt for the compact DMD-style too. LDC already has such a flag (--dwarf-version=N).
|
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation