July 30, 2011
Am I forgetting something, or is "make -fposix.mak" supposed to build the DMD executable on linux. I'm just getting:

make: Nothing to be done for `all'.

This is on the zipped 2.054 release, from the "src/dmd" directory.

It seemed to work for 1.066


July 30, 2011
"Nick Sabalausky" <a@a.a> wrote in message news:j106ib$1t43$1@digitalmars.com...
> Am I forgetting something, or is "make -fposix.mak" supposed to build the DMD executable on linux. I'm just getting:
>
> make: Nothing to be done for `all'.
>
> This is on the zipped 2.054 release, from the "src/dmd" directory.
>
> It seemed to work for 1.066
>

Of course, on 1.066 I used linux.mak, but my understanding is that on newer DMDs posix.mak is supposed to be used instead.


July 30, 2011
On Saturday 30 July 2011 01:59:20 Nick Sabalausky wrote:
> Am I forgetting something, or is "make -fposix.mak" supposed to build the DMD executable on linux. I'm just getting:
> 
> make: Nothing to be done for `all'.
> 
> This is on the zipped 2.054 release, from the "src/dmd" directory.
> 
> It seemed to work for 1.066

It looks like it decided that there's no need to build, because there have been no changes since the last build. Try cleaning first:

make -f posix.mak clean
make -f posix.mak

- Jonathan M Davis
July 30, 2011
"Nick Sabalausky" <a@a.a> wrote in message news:j106ib$1t43$1@digitalmars.com...
> Am I forgetting something, or is "make -fposix.mak" supposed to build the DMD executable on linux. I'm just getting:
>
> make: Nothing to be done for `all'.
>
> This is on the zipped 2.054 release, from the "src/dmd" directory.
>
> It seemed to work for 1.066
>

I gotta learn to 1. STFU and 2. Quit the late-night coding:

I realized about 15 seconds later I had already built the executable, which was still up-to-date...


Top | Discussion index | About this forum | D home