May 19, 2012 Re: DDT 0.5.0 ("Creamfields") released | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Bruno Medeiros | All this seems really good but am I the only one that's getting error to download DDT in eclilpse? When I tried following link on unbuntu eclipse then I am getting error: http://ddt.eclipselabs.org.codespot.com/git.updates/ error: Artifact not found: http://ddt.eclipselabs.org.codespot.com/git.updates/content.jar. Artifact not found: http://ddt.eclipselabs.org.codespot.com/git.updates/content.jar. http://ddt.eclipselabs.org.codespot.com/git.updates/content.jar Am I missing something? Thanks On Tuesday, 17 January 2012 at 15:52:24 UTC, Bruno Medeiros wrote: > On 01/12/2011 17:44, Jacob Carlborg wrote: >> On 2011-12-01 16:18, Bruno Medeiros wrote: >>> On 27/11/2011 18:29, Trass3r wrote: >>>> Does DDT use a separate thread for parsing? >>>> Editing bigger files can be extremely laggy. >>> >>> It does use a separate thread for parsing (standard practice with any >>> Eclipse IDE). Doesn't mean there can't be issues causing laggyness. >>> >>> I'm getting increasingly concerned with these reports of DDT becoming >>> slow when editing large files, but I don't know how to replicate them (I >>> don't program in D with large enough files to ever come across it), so >>> unless someone gives me some test data - the files they are editing, >>> machine specs, what they were doing (just typing or also doing content >>> assist, etc.) - it will be very hard to address this issue! >> >> Well, just put a large library in a project, like Phobos, Tango or DWT. >> std.datetime in Phobos is 35+k lines of code. Then try different >> features like autocompletion and similar. >> > > I'll try something like this, eventually. But we know that the performance of the parser is not that good. > What I was more concerned about, at least in more immediate terms, is significant performance regressions. That is, stuff that has gotten significantly slower with newer DDT releases... that shouldn't be happening at all. But a performance bug could have been introduced. |
May 30, 2012 Re: DDT 0.5.0 ("Creamfields") released | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to #code | On 19/05/2012 04:50, #code wrote: > All this seems really good but am I the only one that's getting error to > download DDT in eclilpse? When I tried following link on unbuntu eclipse > then I am getting error: > > http://ddt.eclipselabs.org.codespot.com/git.updates/ > > error: > > Artifact not found: > http://ddt.eclipselabs.org.codespot.com/git.updates/content.jar. > Artifact not found: > http://ddt.eclipselabs.org.codespot.com/git.updates/content.jar. > http://ddt.eclipselabs.org.codespot.com/git.updates/content.jar > > > Am I missing something? > > Thanks Are you still having this problem? AFAIK there is no issue with the update site, I haven't heard of anyone else having such a problem in the meanwhile. -- Bruno Medeiros - Software Engineer |
May 31, 2012 Re: DDT 0.5.0 ("Creamfields") released | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Bruno Medeiros | Yes. I am still getting the same error. I am on ubuntu with eclipse 3.7.2. http://ddt.eclipselabs.org.codespot.com/git.updates/ Errors are: 1. Artifact not found: http://ddt.eclipselabs.org.codespot.com/git.updates/content.jar. Artifact not found: http://ddt.eclipselabs.org.codespot.com/git.updates/content.jar. http://ddt.eclipselabs.org.codespot.com/git.updates/content.jar 2. No repository found at http://ddt.eclipselabs.org.codespot.com/git.updates/. On Wednesday, 30 May 2012 at 15:59:33 UTC, Bruno Medeiros wrote: > On 19/05/2012 04:50, #code wrote: >> All this seems really good but am I the only one that's getting error to >> download DDT in eclilpse? When I tried following link on unbuntu eclipse >> then I am getting error: >> >> http://ddt.eclipselabs.org.codespot.com/git.updates/ >> >> error: >> >> Artifact not found: >> http://ddt.eclipselabs.org.codespot.com/git.updates/content.jar. >> Artifact not found: >> http://ddt.eclipselabs.org.codespot.com/git.updates/content.jar. >> http://ddt.eclipselabs.org.codespot.com/git.updates/content.jar >> >> >> Am I missing something? >> >> Thanks > > > Are you still having this problem? AFAIK there is no issue with the update site, I haven't heard of anyone else having such a problem in the meanwhile. |
May 31, 2012 Re: DDT 0.5.0 ("Creamfields") released | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to #coder | On 31/05/2012 06:04, #coder wrote: > Yes. I am still getting the same error. I am on ubuntu with eclipse 3.7.2. > > http://ddt.eclipselabs.org.codespot.com/git.updates/ > > Errors are: > > 1. > Artifact not found: > http://ddt.eclipselabs.org.codespot.com/git.updates/content.jar. > Artifact not found: > http://ddt.eclipselabs.org.codespot.com/git.updates/content.jar. > http://ddt.eclipselabs.org.codespot.com/git.updates/content.jar > > 2. > No repository found at > http://ddt.eclipselabs.org.codespot.com/git.updates/. > > > Everything seems to be working fine here. Check that it is not a problem with a proxy or strange firewall that prevents the Eclipse update/install from properly working. (try it on another network) -- Bruno Medeiros - Software Engineer |
June 26, 2012 Re: DDT 0.5.0 ("Creamfields") released | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Bruno Medeiros | I have a "problem" with DDT. It seems that adding an "in contract" to an interface method is not recognized by DDT. It gives "Syntax error on token "}", ; expected after this token". Is this related to an existing bug? interface SomeInterface { void setup(string someNiceParameter) in { enforce(someNiceParameter); } } |
June 26, 2012 Re: DDT 0.5.0 ("Creamfields") released | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Posted in reply to Jarl André | On Tuesday, 26 June 2012 at 17:28:43 UTC, Jarl André wrote:
> I have a "problem" with DDT. It seems that adding an "in contract" to an interface method is not recognized by DDT. It gives "Syntax error on token "}", ; expected after this token". Is this related to an existing bug?
>
> interface SomeInterface {
> void setup(string someNiceParameter) in { enforce(someNiceParameter); }
> }
The code compiles of course, but I don't like reds in my IDE ;)
|
Copyright © 1999-2021 by the D Language Foundation