May 19, 2012 Re: DDT 0.5.0 ("Creamfields") released | |
|---|---|
Posted in reply to Bruno Medeiros | All this seems really good but am I the only one that's getting error to download DDT in eclilpse? When I tried following link on unbuntu eclipse then I am getting error: http://ddt.eclipselabs.org.codespot.com/git.updates/ error: Artifact not found: http://ddt.eclipselabs.org.codespot.com/git.updates/content.jar. Artifact not found: http://ddt.eclipselabs.org.codespot.com/git.updates/content.jar. http://ddt.eclipselabs.org.codespot.com/git.updates/content.jar Am I missing something? Thanks On Tuesday, 17 January 2012 at 15:52:24 UTC, Bruno Medeiros wrote: > On 01/12/2011 17:44, Jacob Carlborg wrote: >> On 2011-12-01 16:18, Bruno Medeiros wrote: >>> On 27/11/2011 18:29, Trass3r wrote: >>>> Does DDT use a separate thread for parsing? >>>> Editing bigger files can be extremely laggy. >>> >>> It does use a separate thread for parsing (standard practice >>> with any >>> Eclipse IDE). Doesn't mean there can't be issues causing >>> laggyness. >>> >>> I'm getting increasingly concerned with these reports of DDT >>> becoming >>> slow when editing large files, but I don't know how to >>> replicate them (I >>> don't program in D with large enough files to ever come >>> across it), so >>> unless someone gives me some test data - the files they are >>> editing, >>> machine specs, what they were doing (just typing or also >>> doing content >>> assist, etc.) - it will be very hard to address this issue! >> >> Well, just put a large library in a project, like Phobos, >> Tango or DWT. >> std.datetime in Phobos is 35+k lines of code. Then try >> different >> features like autocompletion and similar. >> > > I'll try something like this, eventually. But we know that the > performance of the parser is not that good. > What I was more concerned about, at least in more immediate > terms, is significant performance regressions. That is, stuff > that has gotten significantly slower with newer DDT releases... > that shouldn't be happening at all. But a performance bug could > have been introduced. |
May 30, 2012 Re: DDT 0.5.0 ("Creamfields") released | |
|---|---|
Posted in reply to #code | On 19/05/2012 04:50, #code wrote: > All this seems really good but am I the only one that's getting error to > download DDT in eclilpse? When I tried following link on unbuntu eclipse > then I am getting error: > > http://ddt.eclipselabs.org.codespot.com/git.updates/ > > error: > > Artifact not found: > http://ddt.eclipselabs.org.codespot.com/git.updates/content.jar. > Artifact not found: > http://ddt.eclipselabs.org.codespot.com/git.updates/content.jar. > http://ddt.eclipselabs.org.codespot.com/git.updates/content.jar > > > Am I missing something? > > Thanks Are you still having this problem? AFAIK there is no issue with the update site, I haven't heard of anyone else having such a problem in the meanwhile. -- Bruno Medeiros - Software Engineer |
May 31, 2012 Re: DDT 0.5.0 ("Creamfields") released | |
|---|---|
Posted in reply to Bruno Medeiros | Yes. I am still getting the same error. I am on ubuntu with eclipse 3.7.2. http://ddt.eclipselabs.org.codespot.com/git.updates/ Errors are: 1. Artifact not found: http://ddt.eclipselabs.org.codespot.com/git.updates/content.jar. Artifact not found: http://ddt.eclipselabs.org.codespot.com/git.updates/content.jar. http://ddt.eclipselabs.org.codespot.com/git.updates/content.jar 2. No repository found at http://ddt.eclipselabs.org.codespot.com/git.updates/. On Wednesday, 30 May 2012 at 15:59:33 UTC, Bruno Medeiros wrote: > On 19/05/2012 04:50, #code wrote: >> All this seems really good but am I the only one that's >> getting error to >> download DDT in eclilpse? When I tried following link on >> unbuntu eclipse >> then I am getting error: >> >> http://ddt.eclipselabs.org.codespot.com/git.updates/ >> >> error: >> >> Artifact not found: >> http://ddt.eclipselabs.org.codespot.com/git.updates/content.jar. >> Artifact not found: >> http://ddt.eclipselabs.org.codespot.com/git.updates/content.jar. >> http://ddt.eclipselabs.org.codespot.com/git.updates/content.jar >> >> >> Am I missing something? >> >> Thanks > > > Are you still having this problem? AFAIK there is no issue with > the update site, I haven't heard of anyone else having such a > problem in the meanwhile. |
May 31, 2012 Re: DDT 0.5.0 ("Creamfields") released | |
|---|---|
Posted in reply to #coder | On 31/05/2012 06:04, #coder wrote: > Yes. I am still getting the same error. I am on ubuntu with eclipse 3.7.2. > > http://ddt.eclipselabs.org.codespot.com/git.updates/ > > Errors are: > > 1. > Artifact not found: > http://ddt.eclipselabs.org.codespot.com/git.updates/content.jar. > Artifact not found: > http://ddt.eclipselabs.org.codespot.com/git.updates/content.jar. > http://ddt.eclipselabs.org.codespot.com/git.updates/content.jar > > 2. > No repository found at > http://ddt.eclipselabs.org.codespot.com/git.updates/. > > > Everything seems to be working fine here. Check that it is not a problem with a proxy or strange firewall that prevents the Eclipse update/install from properly working. (try it on another network) -- Bruno Medeiros - Software Engineer |
June 26, 2012 Re: DDT 0.5.0 ("Creamfields") released | |
|---|---|
Posted in reply to Bruno Medeiros | I have a "problem" with DDT. It seems that adding an "in
contract" to an interface method is not recognized by DDT. It
gives "Syntax error on token "}", ; expected after this token".
Is this related to an existing bug?
interface SomeInterface {
void setup(string someNiceParameter) in {
enforce(someNiceParameter); }
}
|
June 26, 2012 Re: DDT 0.5.0 ("Creamfields") released | |
|---|---|
Posted in reply to Jarl André | On Tuesday, 26 June 2012 at 17:28:43 UTC, Jarl André wrote:
> I have a "problem" with DDT. It seems that adding an "in
> contract" to an interface method is not recognized by DDT. It
> gives "Syntax error on token "}", ; expected after this token".
> Is this related to an existing bug?
>
> interface SomeInterface {
> void setup(string someNiceParameter) in {
> enforce(someNiceParameter); }
> }
The code compiles of course, but I don't like reds in my IDE ;)
|
Next › Last » |
|---|

Reply