View mode: basic / threaded / horizontal-split · Log in · Help
May 19, 2012
Re: DDT 0.5.0 ("Creamfields") released
All this seems really good but am I the only one that's getting 
error to download DDT in eclilpse? When I tried following link on 
unbuntu eclipse then I am getting error:

http://ddt.eclipselabs.org.codespot.com/git.updates/

error:

Artifact not found: 
http://ddt.eclipselabs.org.codespot.com/git.updates/content.jar.
Artifact not found: 
http://ddt.eclipselabs.org.codespot.com/git.updates/content.jar.
http://ddt.eclipselabs.org.codespot.com/git.updates/content.jar


Am I missing something?

Thanks


On Tuesday, 17 January 2012 at 15:52:24 UTC, Bruno Medeiros wrote:
> On 01/12/2011 17:44, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
>> On 2011-12-01 16:18, Bruno Medeiros wrote:
>>> On 27/11/2011 18:29, Trass3r wrote:
>>>> Does DDT use a separate thread for parsing?
>>>> Editing bigger files can be extremely laggy.
>>>
>>> It does use a separate thread for parsing (standard practice 
>>> with any
>>> Eclipse IDE). Doesn't mean there can't be issues causing 
>>> laggyness.
>>>
>>> I'm getting increasingly concerned with these reports of DDT 
>>> becoming
>>> slow when editing large files, but I don't know how to 
>>> replicate them (I
>>> don't program in D with large enough files to ever come 
>>> across it), so
>>> unless someone gives me some test data - the files they are 
>>> editing,
>>> machine specs, what they were doing (just typing or also 
>>> doing content
>>> assist, etc.) - it will be very hard to address this issue!
>>
>> Well, just put a large library in a project, like Phobos, 
>> Tango or DWT.
>> std.datetime in Phobos is 35+k lines of code. Then try 
>> different
>> features like autocompletion and similar.
>>
>
> I'll try something like this, eventually. But we know that the 
> performance of the parser is not that good.
> What I was more concerned about, at least in more immediate 
> terms, is significant performance regressions. That is, stuff 
> that has gotten significantly slower with newer DDT releases... 
> that shouldn't be happening at all. But a performance bug could 
> have been introduced.
May 30, 2012
Re: DDT 0.5.0 ("Creamfields") released
On 19/05/2012 04:50, #code wrote:
> All this seems really good but am I the only one that's getting error to
> download DDT in eclilpse? When I tried following link on unbuntu eclipse
> then I am getting error:
>
> http://ddt.eclipselabs.org.codespot.com/git.updates/
>
> error:
>
> Artifact not found:
> http://ddt.eclipselabs.org.codespot.com/git.updates/content.jar.
> Artifact not found:
> http://ddt.eclipselabs.org.codespot.com/git.updates/content.jar.
> http://ddt.eclipselabs.org.codespot.com/git.updates/content.jar
>
>
> Am I missing something?
>
> Thanks


Are you still having this problem? AFAIK there is no issue with the 
update site, I haven't heard of anyone else having such a problem in the 
meanwhile.

-- 
Bruno Medeiros - Software Engineer
May 31, 2012
Re: DDT 0.5.0 ("Creamfields") released
Yes. I am still getting the same error. I am on ubuntu with 
eclipse 3.7.2.

http://ddt.eclipselabs.org.codespot.com/git.updates/

Errors are:

1.
Artifact not found: 
http://ddt.eclipselabs.org.codespot.com/git.updates/content.jar.
Artifact not found: 
http://ddt.eclipselabs.org.codespot.com/git.updates/content.jar.
http://ddt.eclipselabs.org.codespot.com/git.updates/content.jar

2.
No repository found at 
http://ddt.eclipselabs.org.codespot.com/git.updates/.



On Wednesday, 30 May 2012 at 15:59:33 UTC, Bruno Medeiros wrote:
> On 19/05/2012 04:50, #code wrote:
>> All this seems really good but am I the only one that's 
>> getting error to
>> download DDT in eclilpse? When I tried following link on 
>> unbuntu eclipse
>> then I am getting error:
>>
>> http://ddt.eclipselabs.org.codespot.com/git.updates/
>>
>> error:
>>
>> Artifact not found:
>> http://ddt.eclipselabs.org.codespot.com/git.updates/content.jar.
>> Artifact not found:
>> http://ddt.eclipselabs.org.codespot.com/git.updates/content.jar.
>> http://ddt.eclipselabs.org.codespot.com/git.updates/content.jar
>>
>>
>> Am I missing something?
>>
>> Thanks
>
>
> Are you still having this problem? AFAIK there is no issue with 
> the update site, I haven't heard of anyone else having such a 
> problem in the meanwhile.
May 31, 2012
Re: DDT 0.5.0 ("Creamfields") released
On 31/05/2012 06:04, #coder wrote:
> Yes. I am still getting the same error. I am on ubuntu with eclipse 3.7.2.
>
> http://ddt.eclipselabs.org.codespot.com/git.updates/
>
> Errors are:
>
> 1.
> Artifact not found:
> http://ddt.eclipselabs.org.codespot.com/git.updates/content.jar.
> Artifact not found:
> http://ddt.eclipselabs.org.codespot.com/git.updates/content.jar.
> http://ddt.eclipselabs.org.codespot.com/git.updates/content.jar
>
> 2.
> No repository found at
> http://ddt.eclipselabs.org.codespot.com/git.updates/.
>
>
>

Everything seems to be working fine here.
Check that it is not a problem with a proxy or strange firewall that 
prevents the Eclipse update/install from properly working. (try it on 
another network)

-- 
Bruno Medeiros - Software Engineer
June 26, 2012
Re: DDT 0.5.0 ("Creamfields") released
I have a "problem" with DDT. It seems that adding an "in 
contract" to an interface method is not recognized by DDT. It 
gives "Syntax error on token "}", ; expected after this token". 
Is this related to an existing bug?

interface SomeInterface {
    void setup(string someNiceParameter) in { 
enforce(someNiceParameter); }
}
June 26, 2012
Re: DDT 0.5.0 ("Creamfields") released
On Tuesday, 26 June 2012 at 17:28:43 UTC, Jarl André wrote:
> I have a "problem" with DDT. It seems that adding an "in 
> contract" to an interface method is not recognized by DDT. It 
> gives "Syntax error on token "}", ; expected after this token". 
> Is this related to an existing bug?
>
> interface SomeInterface {
>     void setup(string someNiceParameter) in { 
> enforce(someNiceParameter); }
> }

The code compiles of course, but I don't like reds in my IDE ;)
Next ›   Last »
1 2 3 4
Top | Discussion index | About this forum | D home